[PATCH v2] ARM: zynq: Add #io-channel-cells to (x)adc node for iio-hwmon

[Michal Simek]

Hi,

On 8.3.2017 21:11, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Fix
> 
> OF: /iio_hwmon: could not get #io-channel-cells for
> /amba/adc at f8007100
> OF: /iio_hwmon: could not get #io-channel-cells for
> /amba/adc at f8007100
> OF: /iio_hwmon: could not get #io-channel-cells for
> /amba/adc at f8007100
> 
> by adding the #io-channel-cells property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf at kernel.org>
> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
> Cc: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann at xilinx.com>
> Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia at ni.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> 
> Changes from v1:
> - fix messed up commit message
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> index f3ac9bf..98233a8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
>  			interrupts = <0 7 4>;
>  			interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>  			clocks = <&clkc 12>;
> +			#io-channel-cells = <1>;
>  		};
>  
>  		can0: can at e0008000 {
> 

I think it will be good to the next step too.
It means also add iio-hwmon node too.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Michal