[PATCH v2] drm/rockchip: Refactor the component match logic.
jeffy
jeffy.chen at rock-chips.com
Wed Mar 15 03:25:03 PDT 2017
Hi Andrzej,
On 03/14/2017 08:05 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Hi Jeffy,
>
> On 14.03.2017 11:45, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>> Currently we are adding all components from the dts, if one of their
>> drivers been disabled, we would not be able to bring up others.
>>
>> Refactor component match logic, follow exynos drm.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen at rock-chips.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda at samsung.com>
>
> Below few nitpicks.
>
> (...)
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> index b360e62..b6bccfc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
>> @@ -356,34 +356,52 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rockchip_drm_pm_ops = {
>> rockchip_drm_sys_resume)
>> };
>>
>> -static int compare_of(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> -{
>> - struct device_node *np = data;
>> +static struct platform_driver *rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[] = {
>> + &vop_platform_driver,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ANALOGIX_DP
>> + &rockchip_dp_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_CDN_DP
>> + &cdn_dp_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_DW_HDMI
>> + &dw_hdmi_rockchip_pltfm_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_DW_MIPI_DSI
>> + &dw_mipi_dsi_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_INNO_HDMI
>> + &inno_hdmi_driver,
>> +#endif
>> +};
>
> To avoid #ifdefs, you can use DRV_PTR [1], but it depends what do you
> hate more? ifdefs or macro magic :)
>
> [1]:
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c#L472
>
Done.
>>
>> - return dev->of_node == np;
>> +static int compare_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> + return dev == (struct device *)data;
>> }
>>
>> -static void rockchip_add_endpoints(struct device *dev,
>> - struct component_match **match,
>> - struct device_node *port)
>> +static struct component_match *rockchip_drm_match_add(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *ep, *remote;
>> + struct component_match *match = NULL;
>> + int i;
>>
>> - for_each_child_of_node(port, ep) {
>> - remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
>> - if (!remote || !of_device_is_available(remote)) {
>> - of_node_put(remote);
>> - continue;
>> - } else if (!of_device_is_available(remote->parent)) {
>> - dev_warn(dev, "parent device of %s is not available\n",
>> - remote->full_name);
>> - of_node_put(remote);
>> - continue;
>> - }
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs); i++) {
>> + struct platform_driver *drv = rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i];
>> + struct device *p = NULL, *d;
>>
>> - drm_of_component_match_add(dev, match, compare_of, remote);
>> - of_node_put(remote);
>> + do {
>> + d = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, p, &drv->driver,
>> + (void *)platform_bus_type.match);
>> + put_device(p);
>> + p = d;
>> +
>> + if (!d)
>> + break;
>> + component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_dev, d);
>> + } while (true);
>> }
>> +
>> + return match ?: ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> }
>>
>> static const struct component_master_ops rockchip_drm_ops = {
>> @@ -391,21 +409,16 @@ static const struct component_master_ops rockchip_drm_ops = {
>> .unbind = rockchip_drm_unbind,
>> };
>>
>> -static int rockchip_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +static int rockchip_drm_platform_of_probe(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> - struct component_match *match = NULL;
>> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> struct device_node *port;
>> + bool found = false;
>> int i;
>>
>> if (!np)
>> return -ENODEV;
>> - /*
>> - * Bind the crtc ports first, so that
>> - * drm_of_find_possible_crtcs called from encoder .bind callbacks
>> - * works as expected.
>> - */
>> +
>> for (i = 0;; i++) {
>> struct device_node *iommu;
>>
>> @@ -429,9 +442,9 @@ static int rockchip_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> is_support_iommu = false;
>> }
>>
>> + found = true;
>> +
>> of_node_put(iommu);
>> - drm_of_component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of,
>> - port->parent);
>> of_node_put(port);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -440,27 +453,27 @@ static int rockchip_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!match) {
>> + if (!found) {
>> dev_err(dev, "No available vop found for display-subsystem.\n");
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>> - /*
>> - * For each bound crtc, bind the encoders attached to its
>> - * remote endpoint.
>> - */
>> - for (i = 0;; i++) {
>> - port = of_parse_phandle(np, "ports", i);
>> - if (!port)
>> - break;
>>
>> - if (!of_device_is_available(port->parent)) {
>> - of_node_put(port);
>> - continue;
>> - }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>>
>> - rockchip_add_endpoints(dev, &match, port);
>> - of_node_put(port);
>> - }
>> +static int rockchip_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct component_match *match = NULL;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = rockchip_drm_platform_of_probe(dev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + match = rockchip_drm_match_add(dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(match))
>> + return PTR_ERR(match);
>>
>> return component_master_add_with_match(dev, &rockchip_drm_ops, match);
>> }
>> @@ -488,7 +501,60 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_drm_platform_driver = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> -module_platform_driver(rockchip_drm_platform_driver);
>> +static void rockchip_drm_unregister_drivers(void)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs) - 1; i >= 0; i--)
>> + platform_driver_unregister(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rockchip_drm_register_drivers(void)
>> +{
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs); i++) {
>> + ret = platform_driver_register(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i]);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_unreg;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_unreg:
>> + for (; i--; )
>> + platform_driver_unregister(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i]);
>
> Strange placement of decremental in for, maybe sth like this would be
> better:
> while (i-- > 0)
> platform_driver_unregister(rockchip_drm_comp_drvs[i]);
>
Yes, this looks better.
>
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init rockchip_drm_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = rockchip_drm_register_drivers();
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = platform_driver_register(&rockchip_drm_platform_driver);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_unreg_drivers;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_unreg_drivers:
>> + rockchip_drm_unregister_drivers();
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit rockchip_drm_fini(void)
>> +{
>> + platform_driver_unregister(&rockchip_drm_platform_driver);
>> +
>> + rockchip_drm_unregister_drivers();
>> +}
>> +
>> +module_init(rockchip_drm_init);
>> +module_exit(rockchip_drm_fini);
>>
>> MODULE_AUTHOR("Mark Yao <mark.yao at rock-chips.com>");
>> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ROCKCHIP DRM Driver");
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h
>> index adc3930..91812bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h
>> @@ -79,4 +79,20 @@ void rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>> int rockchip_drm_wait_line_flag(struct drm_crtc *crtc, unsigned int line_num,
>> unsigned int mstimeout);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_CDN_DP
>> +extern struct platform_driver cdn_dp_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_DW_HDMI
>> +extern struct platform_driver dw_hdmi_rockchip_pltfm_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_DW_MIPI_DSI
>> +extern struct platform_driver dw_mipi_dsi_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_INNO_HDMI
>> +extern struct platform_driver inno_hdmi_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_ANALOGIX_DP
>> +extern struct platform_driver rockchip_dp_driver;
>> +#endif
>> +extern struct platform_driver vop_platform_driver;
>> #endif /* _ROCKCHIP_DRM_DRV_H_ */
>
> I think gcc should be fine if you remove ifdefs. Unused extern
> declarations are ignored, unless you use some paranoic static checker,
> aren't they? But this is also matter of taste.
Ok.
>
>
> Regards
> Andrzej
>
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
>> index 91fbc7b..0da4444 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
>> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int vop_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static struct platform_driver vop_platform_driver = {
>> +struct platform_driver vop_platform_driver = {
>> .probe = vop_probe,
>> .remove = vop_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> @@ -412,9 +412,3 @@ static struct platform_driver vop_platform_driver = {
>> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(vop_driver_dt_match),
>> },
>> };
>> -
>> -module_platform_driver(vop_platform_driver);
>> -
>> -MODULE_AUTHOR("Mark Yao <mark.yao at rock-chips.com>");
>> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ROCKCHIP VOP Driver");
>> -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>
>
>
>
>
Thanx for your comments~
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list