[PATCH v2 4/6] bus: add driver for the Technologic Systems NBUS
Linus Walleij
linus.walleij at linaro.org
Tue Mar 14 06:23:57 PDT 2017
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Sebastien Bourdelin
<sebastien.bourdelin at savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
> On 02/04/2017 05:14 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> + gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(gpios->ndescs, gpios->desc, values);
>>
>> This can also fail and you should check the return code and print an error
>> message if it does.
>>
> As far as i understood, the "gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(...)"
> function doesn't return
> anything, it will return immediately if gpios->desc is null but nothing
> else.
> Did i miss something?
No I did, sorry about that.
We *should* make these functions return errors but currently they do not.
>> Error codes?
>>
> Same question here, these functions only make call to
> "gpiod_set_value_cansleep(...)",
> which as far as i understood doesn't return any error code.
Yeah, forget that.
>>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ts_nbus->csn, 1);
>>
>> Here too.
>>
> Same question, doesn't seem to have an error code.
That too.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list