[PATCH v2 2/2] hwmon: (scpi) Fix the scale of SCP sensor readings
Punit Agrawal
punit.agrawal at arm.com
Wed Mar 8 10:18:52 PST 2017
Carlo Caione <carlo at caione.org> writes:
> From: Carlo Caione <carlo at endlessm.com>
>
> The implementation details for SCPI seems to suggest that the sensor
> readings must be reported by SCP using a well defined scale
> (millidegree Celsius for temperature, millivolts for voltage,
> milliamperes for current, microwatts for power and microjoules for
> energy).
>
> This is also important for the interaction with other subsystems: for
> example both the thermal sub-system and the hwmon sysfs interface expect
> the temperature expressed in millidegree Celsius.
>
> Unfortunately since this behaviour is dependent on the firmware
> implementation there are cases where the sensor readings are reported
> using a different scale. For example in the Amlogic SoCs the
> temperature is reported in degree and not millidegree Celsius.
>
> To take into account this discrepancy and fixup the values reported by
> SCP a new DT property `scpi,sensors-scale' is introduced and used in
> this patch by the scpi-hwmon driver to convert the sensor readings to
> the expected scale.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <carlo at endlessm.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c
> index 094f948f99ff..b64fe7d10742 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/scpi-hwmon.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/thermal.h>
>
> struct sensor_data {
> + unsigned int scale;
> struct scpi_sensor_info info;
> struct device_attribute dev_attr_input;
> struct device_attribute dev_attr_label;
> @@ -44,6 +45,22 @@ struct scpi_sensors {
> const struct attribute_group *groups[2];
> };
>
> +static const u32 scpi_scale[] = {
> + [TEMPERATURE] = 1000, /* (millicelsius) */
> + [VOLTAGE] = 1000, /* (millivolts) */
> + [CURRENT] = 1000, /* (milliamperes) */
> + [POWER] = 1000000, /* (microwatts) */
> + [ENERGY] = 1000000, /* (microjoules) */
> +};
> +
> +void scpi_scale_reading(u64 *value, struct sensor_data *sensor)
This function is not intended for use outside this file. Please mark as
static.
> +{
> + if (scpi_scale[sensor->info.class] != sensor->scale) {
> + *value *= scpi_scale[sensor->info.class];
> + do_div(*value, sensor->scale);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int scpi_read_temp(void *dev, int *temp)
> {
> struct scpi_thermal_zone *zone = dev;
> @@ -57,6 +74,8 @@ static int scpi_read_temp(void *dev, int *temp)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + scpi_scale_reading(&value, sensor);
> +
> *temp = value;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -77,6 +96,8 @@ scpi_show_sensor(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + scpi_scale_reading(&value, sensor);
> +
> return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", value);
> }
>
> @@ -97,6 +118,7 @@ static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops scpi_sensor_ops = {
> static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> u16 nr_sensors, i;
> + u32 scale[] = { 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000000, 1000000 };
> int num_temp = 0, num_volt = 0, num_current = 0, num_power = 0;
> int num_energy = 0;
> struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
> @@ -131,6 +153,16 @@ static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> scpi_sensors->scpi_ops = scpi_ops;
>
> + of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "scpi,sensors-scale",
> + scale, ARRAY_SIZE(scale));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(scale); i++) {
> + if (!scale[i]) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: scale cannot be zero (%d)\n", __func__, i);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> for (i = 0, idx = 0; i < nr_sensors; i++) {
> struct sensor_data *sensor = &scpi_sensors->data[idx];
>
> @@ -178,6 +210,8 @@ static int scpi_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> continue;
> }
>
> + sensor->scale = scale[sensor->info.class];
> +
> sensor->dev_attr_input.attr.mode = S_IRUGO;
> sensor->dev_attr_input.show = scpi_show_sensor;
> sensor->dev_attr_input.attr.name = sensor->input;
So with the function marked as static,
Acked-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal at arm.com>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list