[PATCH 25/58] KVM: arm/arm64: Disallow userspace control of in-kernel IRQ lines

[Marc Zyngier]

From: Christoffer Dall <cdall at linaro.org>

When injecting an IRQ to the VGIC, you now have to present an owner
token for that IRQ line to show that you are the owner of that line.

IRQ lines driven from userspace or via an irqfd do not have an owner and
will simply pass a NULL pointer.

Also get rid of the unused kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq prototype.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall at linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
---
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h         |  4 +---
 virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c      |  3 ++-
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c             |  4 ++--
 virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c             |  3 ++-
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c |  2 +-
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c       | 15 +++++++++++----
 6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 5d5b34534ce9..131668f8599c 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -300,9 +300,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_hyp_init(void);
 void kvm_vgic_init_cpu_hardware(void);
 
 int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
-			bool level);
-int kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
-			       bool level);
+			bool level, void *owner);
 int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq);
 int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq);
 bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
index 07f6f9bfc1f2..8e89d63005c7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
 	if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))) {
 		ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
 					  timer_ctx->irq.irq,
-					  timer_ctx->irq.level);
+					  timer_ctx->irq.level,
+					  timer_ctx);
 		WARN_ON(ret);
 	}
 }
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 72816d3f23a7..a265acc53e39 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
 		if (irq_num < VGIC_NR_SGIS || irq_num >= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq_num, level);
+		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id, irq_num, level, NULL);
 	case KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SPI:
 		if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 			return -ENXIO;
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
 		if (irq_num < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, irq_num, level);
+		return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, irq_num, level, NULL);
 	}
 
 	return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
index 3f0866925b6b..9923eb90cdc7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
@@ -215,7 +215,8 @@ static void kvm_pmu_check_overflow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	if (likely(irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm))) {
 		int ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
-					      pmu->irq_num, overflow);
+					      pmu->irq_num, overflow,
+					      &vcpu->arch.pmu);
 		WARN_ON(ret);
 	}
 }
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
index f138ed2e9c63..b7baf581611a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static int vgic_irqfd_set_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
 
 	if (!vgic_valid_spi(kvm, spi_id))
 		return -EINVAL;
-	return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi_id, level);
+	return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi_id, level, NULL);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index 9628945234e4..fed717e07938 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -235,10 +235,14 @@ static void vgic_sort_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 /*
  * Only valid injection if changing level for level-triggered IRQs or for a
- * rising edge.
+ * rising edge, and in-kernel connected IRQ lines can only be controlled by
+ * their owner.
  */
-static bool vgic_validate_injection(struct vgic_irq *irq, bool level)
+static bool vgic_validate_injection(struct vgic_irq *irq, bool level, void *owner)
 {
+	if (irq->owner != owner)
+		return false;
+
 	switch (irq->config) {
 	case VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL:
 		return irq->line_level != level;
@@ -350,13 +354,16 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq)
  *			      false: to ignore the call
  *	     Level-sensitive  true:  raise the input signal
  *			      false: lower the input signal
+ * @owner:   The opaque pointer to the owner of the IRQ being raised to verify
+ *           that the caller is allowed to inject this IRQ.  Userspace
+ *           injections will have owner == NULL.
  *
  * The VGIC is not concerned with devices being active-LOW or active-HIGH for
  * level-sensitive interrupts.  You can think of the level parameter as 1
  * being HIGH and 0 being LOW and all devices being active-HIGH.
  */
 int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
-			bool level)
+			bool level, void *owner)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct vgic_irq *irq;
@@ -378,7 +385,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
 
 	spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
 
-	if (!vgic_validate_injection(irq, level)) {
+	if (!vgic_validate_injection(irq, level, owner)) {
 		/* Nothing to see here, move along... */
 		spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
 		vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
-- 
2.11.0