[PATCH 01/11] net: phy: Add rockchip phy driver support
David.Wu
david.wu at rock-chips.com
Tue Jun 27 07:44:10 PDT 2017
Hi Andrew,
在 2017/6/24 10:19, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:41:59PM +0800, David Wu wrote:
>> Support internal ephy currently.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu at rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 4 ++
>> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/net/phy/rockchip.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/phy/rockchip.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>> index c360dd6..86010d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>> @@ -350,6 +350,10 @@ config XILINX_GMII2RGMII
>> the Reduced Gigabit Media Independent Interface(RGMII) between
>> Ethernet physical media devices and the Gigabit Ethernet controller.
>>
>> +config ROCKCHIP_MAC_PHY
>
> This is a bit of an odd name, having both MAC and PHY in it. Are there
> any other RockChip PHYs? Any external PHYS? Are they register
> incompatible with the internal PHY? Is it even RockChip IP? Or has it
> been licensed from somebody else?
>
Maybe I just want to highlight it applies to the PHY with Mac
connection, actually I was named Rockchip at the beginning, as Heiko
said, PHY is a wide range, so add a modifier to restrict it.
Yes, we use other external phys, like realtek and etc...
If we have any other phy in our socs, it also could be expanded at
rockchip_phy_tbl{} at rockchip.c
it has been licensed from somebody.
> I would more likely just call it ROCKCHIP_PHY.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list