[PATCH v4] trace: ras: add ARM processor error information trace event
Xie XiuQi
xiexiuqi at huawei.com
Fri Jun 23 18:23:17 PDT 2017
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your comments.
On 2017/6/23 21:42, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:13:43 +0800
> Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi at huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Add a new trace event for ARM processor error information, so that
>> the user will know what error occurred. With this information the
>> user may take appropriate action.
>>
>> These trace events are consistent with the ARM processor error
>> information table which defined in UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.1.
>>
>> ---
>> v4: use __print_flags instead of __print_symbolic, because ARM_PROC_ERR_FLAGS
>> might have more than on bit set.
>> setting up default values for __entry to avoid a lot of else branches.
>> set flags to 0 by default instead of ~0.
>> fix a typo
>> rename arm_proc_err to arm_proc_err_event
>> remove "ARM Processor Error: " prefix
>> rebase on Tyler's patchset v17 "Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64"
>>
>> v3: no change
>>
>> v2: add trace enabled condition as Steven's suggestion.
>
> Where's the trace enabled now?
Sorry, I rebased on new version and lost the trace enabled condition,
and I'll add it back again.
Thanks,
XiuQi
>
>> fix a typo.
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9653767/
>> ---
>>
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org>
>> Cc: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar at codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/ras/ras.c | 8 +++++
>> include/linux/cper.h | 5 ++++
>> include/ras/ras_event.h | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ras/ras.c b/drivers/ras/ras.c
>> index 39701a5..785e25d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ras/ras.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ras/ras.c
>> @@ -22,7 +22,14 @@ void log_non_standard_event(const uuid_le *sec_type, const uuid_le *fru_id,
>>
>> void log_arm_hw_error(struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err)
>> {
>> + int i;
>> + struct cper_arm_err_info *err_info;
>> +
>> trace_arm_event(err);
>
> if (!trace_arm_err_info_event_enabled())
> return;
>
> ?
>
>> +
>> + err_info = (struct cper_arm_err_info *)(err + 1);
>> + for (i = 0; i < err->err_info_num; i++, err_info++)
>> + trace_arm_err_info_event(err_info);
>> }
>>
>> static int __init ras_init(void)
>> @@ -42,6 +49,7 @@ static int __init ras_init(void)
>> EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(mc_event);
>> EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(non_standard_event);
>> EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_event);
>> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_err_info_event);
>>
>> int __init parse_ras_param(char *str)
>> {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cper.h b/include/linux/cper.h
>> index 4c671fc..17546bf 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cper.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cper.h
>> @@ -275,6 +275,11 @@ enum {
>> #define CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_PROPAGATED BIT(2)
>> #define CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_OVERFLOW BIT(3)
>>
>> +#define CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_CACHE 0
>> +#define CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_TLB 1
>> +#define CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_BUS 2
>> +#define CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_UARCH 3
>> +
>> /*
>> * All tables and structs must be byte-packed to match CPER
>> * specification, since the tables are provided by the system BIOS
>> diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
>> index 429f46f..c38a367 100644
>> --- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
>> +++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
>> @@ -206,6 +206,85 @@
>> __entry->running_state, __entry->psci_state)
>> );
>>
>> +#define ARM_PROC_ERR_TYPE \
>> + EM ( CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_CACHE, "cache error" ) \
>> + EM ( CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_TLB, "TLB error" ) \
>> + EM ( CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_BUS, "bus error" ) \
>> + EMe ( CPER_ARM_INFO_TYPE_UARCH, "micro-architectural error" )
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * First define the enums in MM_ACTION_RESULT to be exported to userspace
>> + * via TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM().
>> + */
>> +#undef EM
>> +#undef EMe
>> +#define EM(a, b) TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(a);
>> +#define EMe(a, b) TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(a);
>> +
>> +ARM_PROC_ERR_TYPE
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Now redefine the EM() and EMe() macros to map the enums to the strings
>> + * that will be printed in the output.
>> + */
>> +#undef EM
>> +#undef EMe
>> +#define EM(a, b) { a, b },
>> +#define EMe(a, b) { a, b }
>> +
>> +#define show_proc_err_flags(flags) __print_flags(flags, "|", \
>> + { CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_FIRST, "First error captured" }, \
>> + { CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_LAST, "Last error captured" }, \
>> + { CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_PROPAGATED, "Propagated" }, \
>> + { CPER_ARM_INFO_FLAGS_OVERFLOW, "Overflow" })
>> +
>> +TRACE_EVENT(arm_err_info_event,
>> +
>> + TP_PROTO(const struct cper_arm_err_info *err),
>> +
>> + TP_ARGS(err),
>> +
>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>> + __field(u8, type)
>> + __field(u16, multiple_error)
>> + __field(u8, flags)
>
> Wouldn't you want flags after type? To keep multiple_error on a 2 byte
> boundary.
Yes, I'll, thanks.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>
>> + __field(u64, error_info)
>> + __field(u64, virt_fault_addr)
>> + __field(u64, physical_fault_addr)
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_fast_assign(
>> + __entry->type = err->type;
>> + __entry->multiple_error = ~0;
>> + memset(&__entry->flags, 0,
>> + sizeof(*__entry) - offsetof(typeof(*__entry), flags));
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_MULTI_ERR)
>> + __entry->multiple_error = err->multiple_error;
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_FLAGS)
>> + __entry->flags = err->flags;
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_ERR_INFO)
>> + __entry->error_info = err->error_info;
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_VIRT_ADDR)
>> + __entry->virt_fault_addr = err->virt_fault_addr;
>> +
>> + if (err->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_INFO_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDR)
>> + __entry->physical_fault_addr = err->physical_fault_addr;
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_printk("type: %s; count: %u; flags: %s;"
>> + " error info: %016llx; virtual address: %016llx;"
>> + " physical address: %016llx",
>> + __print_symbolic(__entry->type, ARM_PROC_ERR_TYPE),
>> + __entry->multiple_error,
>> + show_proc_err_flags(__entry->flags),
>> + __entry->error_info, __entry->virt_fault_addr,
>> + __entry->physical_fault_addr)
>> +);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Non-Standard Section Report
>> *
>
>
> .
>
--
Thanks,
Xie XiuQi
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list