[Devel] [PATCH v9 0/3] Cavium ThunderX2 SMMUv3 errata workarounds
Lorenzo Pieralisi
lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com
Thu Jun 22 14:04:37 PDT 2017
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 09:35:35PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 22.06.17 19:58:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 07:22:57PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:35:35PM +0530, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> > > > Cavium ThunderX2 SMMUv3 implementation has two Silicon Erratas.
> > > > 1. Errata ID #74
> > > > SMMU register alias Page 1 is not implemented
> > > > 2. Errata ID #126
> > > > SMMU doesnt support unique IRQ lines and also MSI for gerror,
> > > > eventq and cmdq-sync
> > > >
> > > > The following patchset does software workaround for these two erratas.
> > >
> > > I've picked up the first two patches, and left comments on the final patch.
> >
> > ... except that it doesn't build:
> >
> >
> > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c: In function ‘arm_smmu_v3_resource_size’:
> > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:837:21: error: ‘ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > if (smmu->model == ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX)
> > ^
> > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:837:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > make[4]: *** [drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.o] Error 1
> >
> >
> > I don't see ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX defined, even in linux-next.
> >
> > What's the plan here?
>
> It is defined already in acpica and we actually waiting for the acpi
> maintainers to include it:
>
> https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/d00a4eb86e64
>
> We could add
>
> /* Until ACPICA headers cover IORT rev. C */
> #ifndef ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX
> #define ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX 0x2
> #endif
>
> to both files:
>
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>
I thought it was a solved problem (and that the IORT patch was based
on Robin's workaround) but I was clearly wrong and I apologise to
Will about this.
FWIW, you could add the define in include/linux/acpi_iort.h and I will
remove it whenever ACPICA changes make it into the kernel.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> This is similar to what Robin did.
>
> (I checked arm64 include files and the closest was
> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h, bug this seems not really suitable to
> me.)
>
> I have created a separate patch to be applied at first below. We can
> revert it after acpica was updated.
>
> -Robert
>
>
>
>
> From ad7f0112a2a71059c32bd315835c33cc7bc660b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Robert Richter <rrichter at cavium.com>
> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:20:54 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add temporary Cavium SMMU-V3 model nuber
> definitions
>
> The model number is already defined in acpica and we actually waiting
> for the acpi maintainers to include it:
>
> https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/d00a4eb86e64
>
> Adding those temporary definitions until the change makes it into
> include/acpi/actbl2.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter at cavium.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index 797b28dc7b34..15491237a657 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@
> #define IORT_IOMMU_TYPE ((1 << ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU) | \
> (1 << ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3))
>
> +/* Until ACPICA headers cover IORT rev. C */
> +#ifndef ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX
> +#define ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX 0x2
> +#endif
> +
> struct iort_its_msi_chip {
> struct list_head list;
> struct fwnode_handle *fw_node;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 380969aa60d5..c759dfa7442d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,11 @@
> #define MSI_IOVA_BASE 0x8000000
> #define MSI_IOVA_LENGTH 0x100000
>
> +/* Until ACPICA headers cover IORT rev. C */
> +#ifndef ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX
> +#define ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX 0x2
> +#endif
> +
> static bool disable_bypass;
> module_param_named(disable_bypass, disable_bypass, bool, S_IRUGO);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_bypass,
> --
> 2.11.0
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list