[PATCH v3 1/3] perf: xgene: Parse PMU subnode from the match table

Mark Rutland mark.rutland at arm.com
Thu Jun 22 09:39:31 PDT 2017


On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 11:02:24AM -0700, Hoan Tran wrote:
> This patch parses PMU Subnode from a match table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran at apm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c
> index 35b5289..5ffd580 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c
> @@ -1047,9 +1047,35 @@ xgene_pmu_dev_ctx *acpi_get_pmu_hw_inf(struct xgene_pmu *xgene_pmu,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct acpi_device_id xgene_pmu_acpi_type_match[] = {
> +	{"APMC0D5D", PMU_TYPE_L3C},
> +	{"APMC0D5E", PMU_TYPE_IOB},
> +	{"APMC0D5F", PMU_TYPE_MCB},
> +	{"APMC0D60", PMU_TYPE_MC},
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct acpi_device_id *xgene_pmu_acpi_match_type(
> +					const struct acpi_device_id *ids,
> +					struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> +	const struct acpi_device_id *match_id = NULL;
> +	const struct acpi_device_id *id;
> +

Since this was the subject of confusion before, can we please add a
comment here, e.g.

	/*
	 * We have to iterate over the list as acpi_match_device_ids()
	 * doesn't tell us *which* entry matches, and there's no helper
	 * that can do thtat for us.
	 */

With that:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

> +	for (id = ids; id->id[0] || id->cls; id++) {
> +		if (!acpi_match_device_ids(adev, id))
> +			match_id = id;
> +		else if (match_id)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return match_id;
> +}
> +
>  static acpi_status acpi_pmu_dev_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 level,
>  				    void *data, void **return_value)
>  {
> +	const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
>  	struct xgene_pmu *xgene_pmu = data;
>  	struct xgene_pmu_dev_ctx *ctx;
>  	struct acpi_device *adev;
> @@ -1059,17 +1085,11 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pmu_dev_add(acpi_handle handle, u32 level,
>  	if (acpi_bus_get_status(adev) || !adev->status.present)
>  		return AE_OK;
>  
> -	if (!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "APMC0D5D"))
> -		ctx = acpi_get_pmu_hw_inf(xgene_pmu, adev, PMU_TYPE_L3C);
> -	else if (!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "APMC0D5E"))
> -		ctx = acpi_get_pmu_hw_inf(xgene_pmu, adev, PMU_TYPE_IOB);
> -	else if (!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "APMC0D5F"))
> -		ctx = acpi_get_pmu_hw_inf(xgene_pmu, adev, PMU_TYPE_MCB);
> -	else if (!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "APMC0D60"))
> -		ctx = acpi_get_pmu_hw_inf(xgene_pmu, adev, PMU_TYPE_MC);
> -	else
> -		ctx = NULL;
> +	acpi_id = xgene_pmu_acpi_match_type(xgene_pmu_acpi_type_match, adev);
> +	if (!acpi_id)
> +		return AE_OK;
>  
> +	ctx = acpi_get_pmu_hw_inf(xgene_pmu, adev, (u32)acpi_id->driver_data);
>  	if (!ctx)
>  		return AE_OK;
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list