[PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler

[Shubham Bansal]

Hi Daniel,

Good news. Got the CALL to work.

[  145.670882] test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [287/308 JIT'ed]

Awesome. Do you think with this implementation, the patch could get
accepted? If you think so, then I will send the patch in couple of
days after some refactoring, if not, then do let me know what more is
required?

Best,
Shubham Bansal


On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 04:26 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> So ultimately, we call helper_function which takes u64 as arguments
>> only. I know its asking a lot, but can you please confirm this asap? I
>> would like to start implementing it.
>
>
> Yes, that is correct. I think it would be the better, more generic
> approach going forward to always assume that.