arm64: next-20170614 panics on boot

[Marc Zyngier]

On 16/06/17 10:51, Yury Norov wrote:
> (CC irqchip maintainers)
> 
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:33:37PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:08:40PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today's linux next falls into panic in init_IRQ():
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:
>>>  53 void __init init_IRQ(void)
>>>  54 {
>>>  55         irqchip_init();
>>>  56         if (!handle_arch_irq)
>>>  57                 panic("No interrupt controller found.");
>>>  58 }
>>>
>>>
>>> Bisecting points to the patch 6fedb069def034 ("of: Provide dummy
>>> of_device_compatible_match() for compile-testing"), but reverting it
>>> doesn't help. It seems like yesterday's linux-next also hangs.  Right
>>> now I cannot continue with debugging, but if nothing will get clear,
>>> I'll back to it at this evening.
>>
>> Sorry, forgot to attach the config. This is it. Also, I run arm64 on
>> qemu.
> 
> The next-20170616 boots well for me. I didn't manage to bisect the
> source of problem - it points to different commmits, and reverting
> them doesn't help. The source of the problem is that irqchip_init()
> doesn't set the handle_arch_irq. It should be done in 
> of_irq_init() at the line
> 
> drivers/of/irq.c:
> 542         while (!list_empty(&intc_desc_list)) {
>         ...
> 561                         ret = desc->irq_init_cb(desc->dev,
> 562                                                 desc->interrupt_parent);
>         ...
> 586         }
> 
> On next-20170614 and 15 intc_desc_list is empty at the point. It
> should be populated earlier in the loop
> 510         for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, matches, &match)
> 
> But np becomes 0 at the 1st iteration, and so the program doesn't enter the
> loop. At the first glance there's no recent changes in related code. Maybe it's dts
> issue?..

Dunno. I'm booting -next as of today in various arm64 VMs, and
everything seems fine. Even 20170614 boots fine in the same
configuration. You'll have to investigate a bit more, I'm afraid.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...