[PATCH v2 3/7] includes: dt-bindings: Rename STM32F429 pinctrl DT bindings

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue at st.com> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Gentle ping.
>
> On 04/12/2017 03:31 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 04/10/2017 10:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
>>>>
>>>> STM32F4 MCU series is composed of several SOC (STM32F429, STM32F469,
>>>> ...).
>>>> Most of muxing definition are identical. So to avoid to duplicate
>>>> bindings
>>>> definition, this patch create common definitions.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is a lot of churn. Some confirmation that the resultant dtb is the
>>> same before and after would be nice. Perhaps the script you used to
>>> convert this as well.
>>
>>
>> I tried to use fdtdump but it seems bugged. So I used directly dtc
>> binary to (re)generate dts files (before and after apply the series) and
>> I compared "pinmux" field in both case.
>>
>> Example on stm32f469-disco:
>>
>> ./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-after.dts
>> stm32f469-disco-after.dtb
>>
>> ./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-before.dts
>> stm32f469-disco-before.dtb
>>
>> cat stm32f469-disco-after.dts | grep pinmux
>> cat stm32f469-disco-before.dts | grep pinmux
>>
>
> Do you agree with verifications ?

I would expect you do "diff -u stm32f469-disco-before.dts
stm32f469-disco-after.dts".

Rob