[PATCH v2] drm/exynos/dsi: Remove error handling for bridge_node DT parsing

[Tobias Jakobi]

Hello Hoegeun,

my last question (does this regress the case "node required, but
absent") still stands.


Hoegeun Kwon wrote:
> Remove the error handling of bridge_node because the bridge_node is
> required optionally.
I don't think a construction like that exists. Either it's required, or
it's optional. "required optionally" makes no sense to me (but I'm not a
native speaker).

- Tobias


> For example, In case of Exynos SoC, a bridge device such as mDNIe and
> MIC could be placed between Display Controller and MIPI DSI device but
> the bridge device is required optionally.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon at samsung.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi Inki and Tobias,
> 
> Thanks for your review.
> 
> Changes for V2:
> - Modified the commit message in more detail than before.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Hoegeun
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> index a11b795..6ee0dac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
> @@ -1651,8 +1651,6 @@ static int exynos_dsi_parse_dt(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	dsi->bridge_node = of_graph_get_remote_node(node, DSI_PORT_IN, 0);
> -	if (!dsi->bridge_node)
> -		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>