[RFC PATCH 1/4] EDAC: mvebu: Add driver for Marvell Armada SoCs
Jan Lübbe
jlu at pengutronix.de
Fri Jun 9 06:14:22 PDT 2017
Hi Chris!
On Do, 2017-06-08 at 16:11 +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> This adds an EDAC driver for the memory controller and L2 cache used on
> a number of Marvell Armada SoCs.
Why have two separate drivers in the same file and enabled with the same
Kconfig option?
[...]
> +static void mvebu_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> +{
> + struct mvebu_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info;
> + u32 reg;
> + u32 err_addr;
> + u32 sdram_ecc;
> + u32 comp_ecc;
> + u32 syndrome;
> +
> + reg = readl(pdata->mc_vbase + MVEBU_SDRAM_ERR_ADDR);
> + if (!reg)
> + return;
> +
> + err_addr = reg & ~0x3;
The ERR_ADDR register is not a physical address but contains multiple
fields (bank, col, chip select and error type).
> + sdram_ecc = readl(pdata->mc_vbase + MVEBU_SDRAM_ERR_ECC_RCVD);
> + comp_ecc = readl(pdata->mc_vbase + MVEBU_SDRAM_ERR_ECC_CALC);
> + syndrome = sdram_ecc ^ comp_ecc;
> +
> + /* first bit clear in ECC Err Reg, 1 bit error, correctable by HW */
> + if (!(reg & 0x1))
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED, mci, 1,
> + err_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + err_addr & PAGE_MASK, syndrome,
> + 0, 0, -1,
> + mci->ctl_name, "");
> + else /* 2 bit error, UE */
> + edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci, 1,
> + err_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + err_addr & PAGE_MASK, 0,
> + 0, 0, -1,
> + mci->ctl_name, "");
> +
> + /* clear the error */
> + writel(0, pdata->mc_vbase + MVEBU_SDRAM_ERR_ADDR);
This field is documented to be read-only. I had to write the Error
Interrupt Cause Register (0x14d0) or Message Interrupt Cause Register
(0x14d8) to allow the capture of new error details.
[...]
> +static void get_total_mem(struct mvebu_mc_pdata *pdata)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = NULL;
> + struct resource res;
> + int ret;
> + unsigned long total_mem = 0;
> +
> + for_each_node_by_type(np, "memory") {
> + ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res);
> + if (ret)
> + continue;
> +
> + total_mem += resource_size(&res);
> + }
> +
> + pdata->total_mem = total_mem;
> +}
I think we can calculate the sizes by reading back the individual CS
configuration registers.
> +static void mvebu_init_csrows(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + struct mvebu_mc_pdata *pdata)
[...]
> + devtype = (ctl >> 20) & 0x3;
> + switch (devtype) {
> + case 0x0:
> + dimm->dtype = DEV_X32;
> + break;
> + case 0x2: /* could be X8 too, but no way to tell */
> + dimm->dtype = DEV_X16;
> + break;
> + case 0x3:
> + dimm->dtype = DEV_X4;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dimm->dtype = DEV_UNKNOWN;
> + break;
> + }
This register is documented as reserved? I pulled the X8/X16 information
from the Address Control Register (CSnStruct bits).
> + dimm->edac_mode = EDAC_SECDED;
> +}
[...]
> + if (!devres_open_group(&pdev->dev, mvebu_mc_err_probe, GFP_KERNEL))
> + return -ENOMEM;
devres automatically opens a group per device, so this shouln't be
needed (although other EADC drivers do the same).
> + layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHIP_SELECT;
> + layers[0].size = 1;
> + layers[0].is_virt_csrow = true;
> + layers[1].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_CHANNEL;
> + layers[1].size = 1;
> + layers[1].is_virt_csrow = false;
I'm not sure if this is needed. In my driver, only one CHIP_SELECT layer
with size 4 (max number of chip selects) is configured and seems to work
fine.
[...]
> + mci->scrub_mode = SCRUB_SW_SRC;
I'm not sure if this works as expected ARM as it is currently
implemented, but that's a topic for a different mail.
[...]
> + /* setup MC registers */
> + writel(0, pdata->mc_vbase + MVEBU_SDRAM_ERR_ADDR);
> + ctl = readl(pdata->mc_vbase + MVEBU_SDRAM_ERR_ECC_CNTL);
> + ctl = (ctl & 0xff00ffff) | 0x10000;
> + writel(ctl, pdata->mc_vbase + MVEBU_SDRAM_ERR_ECC_CNTL);
This configures the single bit error threshold to 1. My driver does the
same.
> +
> + if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) {
> + /* acquire interrupt that reports errors */
> + pdata->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
> + pdata->irq,
> + mvebu_mc_isr,
> + 0,
> + "[EDAC] MC err",
> + mci);
Which IRQ do you use? The current DT doesn't configure interrupts. Also
it seems that the events are passed through additional layers of
mask/status registers which are not yet represented in the Armada-XP IRQ
hierarchy. So my driver currently uses polling.
[...]
> +static const struct of_device_id mvebu_mc_err_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "marvell,armada-xp-sdram-controller", },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mvebu_mc_err_of_match);
I currently do the same, but that's not really correct:
In arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm.c mvebu_pm_suspend_init already uses that
compatible to call request_mem_region(). So need some coordination
between that and the new EDAC driver.
> +/*********************** L2 err device **********************************/
> +static void mvebu_l2_check(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev)
> +{
> +
> + struct mvebu_l2_pdata *pdata = edac_dev->pvt_info;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl(pdata->l2_vbase + MVEBU_L2_ERR_ATTR);
> + if (!(val & 1))
> + return;
> +
> + pr_err("ECC Error in CPU L2 cache\n");
> + pr_err("L2 Error Attributes Capture Register: 0x%08x\n", val);
> + pr_err("L2 Error Address Capture Register: 0x%08x\n",
> + readl(pdata->l2_vbase + MVEBU_L2_ERR_ADDR));
> +
> + if (L2_ERR_TYPE(val) == 0)
> + edac_device_handle_ce(edac_dev, 0, 0, edac_dev->ctl_name);
> +
> + if (L2_ERR_TYPE(val) == 1)
> + edac_device_handle_ue(edac_dev, 0, 0, edac_dev->ctl_name);
We can use the address and attribute registers to collect more
information. Also, the counter registers need to be handled.
> + writel(BIT(0), pdata->l2_vbase + MVEBU_L2_ERR_ATTR);
OK, I do the same.
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t mvebu_l2_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev = dev_id;
> + struct mvebu_l2_pdata *pdata = edac_dev->pvt_info;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl(pdata->l2_vbase + MVEBU_L2_ERR_ATTR);
> + if (!(val & 1))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + mvebu_l2_check(edac_dev);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
This interrupt seems to be shared with the PMU? Does this work without
implementing support for the additional IRQ status register?
> +static ssize_t inject_ctrl_show(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev,
[...]
> +static ssize_t inject_ctrl_store(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev,
> + const char *data, size_t count)
[...]
> +static ssize_t inject_mask_show(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev,
> + char *data)
[...]
> +static ssize_t inject_mask_store(struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev,
> + const char *data, size_t count)
[...]
> +static struct edac_dev_sysfs_attribute mvebu_l2_sysfs_attributes[] = {
> + __ATTR_RW(inject_ctrl),
> + __ATTR_RW(inject_mask),
> + {},
> +};
I'd prefer to use debugfs for that.
> +static int mvebu_l2_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev;
> + struct mvebu_l2_pdata *pdata;
> + struct resource *r;
> + int res;
> +
> + if (!devres_open_group(&pdev->dev, mvebu_l2_err_probe, GFP_KERNEL))
> + return -ENOMEM;
This is is not needed.
[...]
Regards,
Jan
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list