[PATCH net] bpf, arm64: use separate register for state in stxr
Daniel Borkmann
daniel at iogearbox.net
Wed Jun 7 04:45:37 PDT 2017
Will reported that in BPF_XADD we must use a different register in stxr
instruction for the status flag due to otherwise CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE
behavior per architecture. Reference manual says [1]:
If s == t, then one of the following behaviors must occur:
* The instruction is UNDEFINED.
* The instruction executes as a NOP.
* The instruction performs the store to the specified address, but
the value stored is UNKNOWN.
Thus, use a different temporary register for the status flag to fix it.
Disassembly extract from test 226/STX_XADD_DW from test_bpf.ko:
[...]
0000003c: c85f7d4b ldxr x11, [x10]
00000040: 8b07016b add x11, x11, x7
00000044: c80c7d4b stxr w12, x11, [x10]
00000048: 35ffffac cbnz w12, 0x0000003c
[...]
[1] https://static.docs.arm.com/ddi0487/b/DDI0487B_a_armv8_arm.pdf, p.6132
Fixes: 85f68fe89832 ("bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_XADD")
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net>
---
arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 71f9305..c870d6f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#define TMP_REG_1 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0)
#define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1)
#define TCALL_CNT (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2)
+#define TMP_REG_3 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 3)
/* Map BPF registers to A64 registers */
static const int bpf2a64[] = {
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@
/* temporary registers for internal BPF JIT */
[TMP_REG_1] = A64_R(10),
[TMP_REG_2] = A64_R(11),
+ [TMP_REG_3] = A64_R(12),
/* tail_call_cnt */
[TCALL_CNT] = A64_R(26),
/* temporary register for blinding constants */
@@ -319,6 +321,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
const u8 src = bpf2a64[insn->src_reg];
const u8 tmp = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_2];
+ const u8 tmp3 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_3];
const s16 off = insn->off;
const s32 imm = insn->imm;
const int i = insn - ctx->prog->insnsi;
@@ -689,10 +692,10 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(A64_PRFM(tmp, PST, L1, STRM), ctx);
emit(A64_LDXR(isdw, tmp2, tmp), ctx);
emit(A64_ADD(isdw, tmp2, tmp2, src), ctx);
- emit(A64_STXR(isdw, tmp2, tmp, tmp2), ctx);
+ emit(A64_STXR(isdw, tmp2, tmp, tmp3), ctx);
jmp_offset = -3;
check_imm19(jmp_offset);
- emit(A64_CBNZ(0, tmp2, jmp_offset), ctx);
+ emit(A64_CBNZ(0, tmp3, jmp_offset), ctx);
break;
/* R0 = ntohx(*(size *)(((struct sk_buff *)R6)->data + imm)) */
--
1.9.3
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list