[PATCH v2 07/25] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Add ICV_IAR1_EL1 handler
Christoffer Dall
cdall at linaro.org
Mon Jun 5 02:21:00 PDT 2017
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:20:59AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Add a handler for reading the guest's view of the ICC_IAR1_EL1
> register. This involves finding the highest priority Group-1
> interrupt, checking against both PMR and the active group
> priority, activating the interrupt and setting the group
> priority as active.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 1 +
> virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index fffb91202bc9..401db585a534 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> @@ -405,6 +405,7 @@
> #define ICH_LR_PHYS_ID_SHIFT 32
> #define ICH_LR_PHYS_ID_MASK (0x3ffULL << ICH_LR_PHYS_ID_SHIFT)
> #define ICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT 48
> +#define ICH_LR_PRIORITY_MASK (0xffULL << ICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT)
>
> /* These are for GICv2 emulation only */
> #define GICH_LR_VIRTUALID (0x3ffUL << 0)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 168539dfd0b9..16a2eadc7a5c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>
> #define vtr_to_max_lr_idx(v) ((v) & 0xf)
> #define vtr_to_nr_pre_bits(v) (((u32)(v) >> 26) + 1)
> +#define vtr_to_nr_apr_regs(v) (1 << (vtr_to_nr_pre_bits(v) - 5))
>
> static u64 __hyp_text __gic_v3_get_lr(unsigned int lr)
> {
> @@ -375,6 +376,79 @@ void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_write_vmcr(u32 vmcr)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
>
> +static int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_get_group(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u32 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
> + u8 crm = (esr & ESR_ELx_SYS64_ISS_CRM_MASK) >> ESR_ELx_SYS64_ISS_CRM_SHIFT;
> +
> + return crm != 8;
> +}
> +
> +#define GICv3_IDLE_PRIORITY 0xff
> +
> +static int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_highest_priority_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + u32 vmcr,
> + u64 *lr_val)
> +{
> + unsigned int used_lrs = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.used_lrs;
> + u8 priority = GICv3_IDLE_PRIORITY;
> + int i, lr = -1;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < used_lrs; i++) {
> + u64 val = __gic_v3_get_lr(i);
> + u8 lr_prio = (val & ICH_LR_PRIORITY_MASK) >> ICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT;
> +
> + /* Not pending in the state? */
> + if ((val & ICH_LR_STATE) != ICH_LR_PENDING_BIT)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Group-0 interrupt, but Group-0 disabled? */
> + if (!(val & ICH_LR_GROUP) && !(vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG0_MASK))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Group-1 interrupt, but Group-1 disabled? */
> + if ((val & ICH_LR_GROUP) && !(vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG1_MASK))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Not the highest priority? */
> + if (lr_prio >= priority)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* This is a candidate */
> + priority = lr_prio;
> + *lr_val = val;
> + lr = i;
> + }
> +
> + if (lr == -1)
> + *lr_val = ICC_IAR1_EL1_SPURIOUS;
> +
> + return lr;
> +}
> +
> +static int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_get_highest_active_priority(void)
> +{
> + u8 nr_pre_bits = vtr_to_nr_pre_bits(read_gicreg(ICH_VTR_EL2));
> + u8 nr_apr_regs = vtr_to_nr_apr_regs(read_gicreg(ICH_VTR_EL2));
> + u32 hap = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_apr_regs; i++) {
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = __vgic_v3_read_ap0rn(i);
> + val |= __vgic_v3_read_ap1rn(i);
> + if (!val) {
> + hap += 32;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + return (hap + __ffs(val)) << (8 - nr_pre_bits);
I don't understand this shift, and I think I asked about it before, so
maybe if it's a reused concept we can use a static inline or at least
provide a comment?
> + }
> +
> + return GICv3_IDLE_PRIORITY;
> +}
> +
> static unsigned int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_get_bpr0(u32 vmcr)
> {
> return (vmcr & ICH_VMCR_BPR0_MASK) >> ICH_VMCR_BPR0_SHIFT;
> @@ -395,6 +469,79 @@ static unsigned int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_get_bpr1(u32 vmcr)
> return bpr;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Convert a priority to a preemption level, taking the relevant BPR
> + * into account by zeroing the sub-priority bits.
> + */
> +static u8 __hyp_text __vgic_v3_pri_to_pre(u8 pri, u32 vmcr, int grp)
> +{
> + unsigned int bpr;
> +
> + if (!grp)
> + bpr = __vgic_v3_get_bpr0(vmcr) + 1;
> + else
> + bpr = __vgic_v3_get_bpr1(vmcr);
> +
> + return pri & (GENMASK(7, 0) << bpr);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * The priority value is independent of any of the BPR values, so we
> + * normalize it using nr_pre_bits. This guarantees that no matter what
> + * the guest does with its BPR, we can always set/get the same value
> + * of a priority.
> + */
> +static void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_set_active_priority(u8 pri, u32 vmcr, int grp)
> +{
> + u8 nr_pre_bits, pre, ap;
> + u32 val;
> + int apr;
> +
> + nr_pre_bits = vtr_to_nr_pre_bits(read_gicreg(ICH_VTR_EL2));
> + pre = __vgic_v3_pri_to_pre(pri, vmcr, grp);
> + ap = pre >> (8 - nr_pre_bits);
Again here, I don't get this shift.
> + apr = ap / 32;
> +
> + val = __vgic_v3_read_ap1rn(apr);
> + __vgic_v3_write_ap1rn(val | BIT(ap % 32), apr);
How are we sure this is a group 1 interrupt here?
> +}
> +
> +static void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_read_iar(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vmcr, int rt)
> +{
> + u64 lr_val;
> + u8 lr_prio, pmr;
> + int lr, grp;
> +
> + grp = __vgic_v3_get_group(vcpu);
> +
> + lr = __vgic_v3_highest_priority_lr(vcpu, vmcr, &lr_val);
> + if (lr < 0)
> + goto spurious;
> +
> + if (grp != !!(lr_val & ICH_LR_GROUP))
> + goto spurious;
> +
> + pmr = (vmcr & ICH_VMCR_PMR_MASK) >> ICH_VMCR_PMR_SHIFT;
> + lr_prio = (lr_val & ICH_LR_PRIORITY_MASK) >> ICH_LR_PRIORITY_SHIFT;
> + if (pmr <= lr_prio)
> + goto spurious;
> +
> + if (__vgic_v3_get_highest_active_priority() <= lr_prio)
> + goto spurious;
> +
> + lr_val &= ~ICH_LR_STATE;
> + /* No active state for LPIs */
> + if ((lr_val & ICH_LR_VIRTUAL_ID_MASK) <= VGIC_MAX_SPI)
> + lr_val |= ICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT;
> + __gic_v3_set_lr(lr_val, lr);
> + __vgic_v3_set_active_priority(lr_prio, vmcr, grp);
> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rt, lr_val & ICH_LR_VIRTUAL_ID_MASK);
> + return;
> +
> +spurious:
> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rt, ICC_IAR1_EL1_SPURIOUS);
> +}
> +
> static void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_read_igrpen1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 vmcr, int rt)
> {
> vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rt, !!(vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG1_MASK));
> @@ -459,6 +606,9 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> is_read = (esr & ESR_ELx_SYS64_ISS_DIR_MASK) == ESR_ELx_SYS64_ISS_DIR_READ;
>
> switch (sysreg) {
> + case SYS_ICC_IAR1_EL1:
> + fn = __vgic_v3_read_iar;
> + break;
So we don't provide a write-ignore function here because we rely on the
hardware to always trap that at EL1 instead?
I remember we discussed this before, but I don't remember if the
conclusion was that this is 100% safe.
> case SYS_ICC_GRPEN1_EL1:
> if (is_read)
> fn = __vgic_v3_read_igrpen1;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Thanks,
-Christoffer
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list