[PATCH 1/3] memory: mtk-smi: add larbid init routine
Honghui Zhang
honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
Thu Jul 27 18:15:05 PDT 2017
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 17:42 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 07/27/2017 04:01 AM, honghui.zhang at mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang at mediatek.com>
> >
> > In the commit 3c8f4ad85c4b ("memory/mediatek: add support for mt2701"),
> > the larb->larbid was added but not initialized.
> > Mediatek's gen1 smi need this hardware larbid information to get the
> > register offset which controls whether enable iommu for this larb.
> > This patch add the initialize routine for larbid.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> > index 2b798bb4..fe36b3e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> > @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct device_node *smi_node;
> > struct platform_device *smi_pdev;
> > + int err;
> >
> > if (!dev->pm_domain)
> > return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > @@ -263,6 +264,14 @@ static int mtk_smi_larb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return PTR_ERR(larb->smi.clk_smi);
> > larb->smi.dev = dev;
> >
> > + err = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "mediatek,larbid",
> > + &larb->larbid);
> > + if (err && of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node,
> > + "mediatek,mt2701-smi-larb")) {
>
> Instead of checking hard-coded bindings you should be able to determine the
> generation using the smi_pdev.
> Apart I think it would be better to check for mediatek,larbid only on
> MTK_SIM_GEN1, or do I miss something?
>
Hi, Matthias,
There's a new SoC of mediatek which use MTK_SMI_GEN2 hardware, but it
has 2 iommus and 2 smi_common, and we are intend to send it's driver
soon. It need the mediatek,larbid to identify which iommu should be
binding to.
This patch use the hard-code bindings will make the future work easier.
thanks.
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> > + dev_err(dev, "missing larbid property\n");
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > smi_node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,smi", 0);
> > if (!smi_node)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list