[PATCH] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: Request PMU SPIs with IRQF_PER_CPU
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Tue Jul 25 09:26:25 PDT 2017
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 04:36:15PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Since the PMU register interface is banked per CPU, CPU PMU interrrupts
> cannot be handled by a CPU other than the one with the PMU asserting the
> interrupt. This means that migrating PMU SPIs, as we do during a CPU
> hotplug operation doesn't make any sense and can lead to the IRQ being
> disabled entirely if we route a spurious IRQ to the new affinity target.
>
> This has been observed in practice on AMD Seattle, where CPUs on the
> non-boot cluster appear to take a spurious PMU IRQ when coming online,
> which is routed to CPU0 where it cannot be handled.
>
> This patch passes IRQF_PERCPU for PMU SPIs and forcefullt sets their
forcefully
> affinity prior to requesting them, ensuring that they cannot
> be migrated during hotplug events.
>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> Fixes: 3cf7ee98b848 ("drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe")
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
The patch itself looks good to me.
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
Mark.
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index dc459eb1246b..fa18e4858141 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -569,22 +569,32 @@ int armpmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
> if (irq != other_irq) {
> pr_warn("mismatched PPIs detected.\n");
> err = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_out;
> }
> } else {
> + err = irq_force_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(cpu));
> +
> + if (err && num_possible_cpus() > 1) {
> + pr_warn("unable to set irq affinity (irq=%d, cpu=%u)\n",
> + irq, cpu);
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> +
> err = request_irq(irq, handler,
> - IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_NO_THREAD, "arm-pmu",
> + IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
> + "arm-pmu",
> per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
> }
>
> - if (err) {
> - pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
> - irq);
> - return err;
> - }
> + if (err)
> + goto err_out;
>
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs);
> -
> return 0;
> +
> +err_out:
> + pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n", irq);
> + return err;
> }
>
> int armpmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> @@ -628,12 +638,6 @@ static int arm_perf_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> enable_percpu_irq(irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> return 0;
> }
> -
> - if (irq_force_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(cpu)) &&
> - num_possible_cpus() > 1) {
> - pr_warn("unable to set irq affinity (irq=%d, cpu=%u)\n",
> - irq, cpu);
> - }
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.1.4
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list