[PATCH 2/2] ARM: NOMMU: Wire-up default DMA interface
Vladimir Murzin
vladimir.murzin at arm.com
Thu Jul 20 03:19:59 PDT 2017
The way how default DMA pool is exposed has changed and now we need to
use dedicated interface to work with it. This patch makes alloc/release
operations to use such interface. Since, default DMA pool is not
handled by generic code anymore we have to implement our own mmap
operation.
Tested-by: Andras Szemzo <sza at esh.hu>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin at arm.com>
---
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
index 90ee354..6db5fc2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping-nommu.c
@@ -40,9 +40,21 @@ static void *arm_nommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
{
const struct dma_map_ops *ops = &dma_noop_ops;
+ void *ret;
/*
- * We are here because:
+ * Try generic allocator first if we are advertised that
+ * consistency is not required.
+ */
+
+ if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
+ return ops->alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp, attrs);
+
+ ret = dma_alloc_from_global_coherent(size, dma_handle);
+
+ /*
+ * dma_alloc_from_global_coherent() may fail because:
+ *
* - no consistent DMA region has been defined, so we can't
* continue.
* - there is no space left in consistent DMA region, so we
@@ -50,11 +62,8 @@ static void *arm_nommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
* advertised that consistency is not required.
*/
- if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
- return ops->alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp, attrs);
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- return NULL;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == NULL);
+ return ret;
}
static void arm_nommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
@@ -63,14 +72,31 @@ static void arm_nommu_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
{
const struct dma_map_ops *ops = &dma_noop_ops;
- if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT)
+ if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT) {
ops->free(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_addr, attrs);
- else
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ } else {
+ int ret = dma_release_from_global_coherent(get_order(size),
+ cpu_addr);
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == 0);
+ }
return;
}
+static int arm_nommu_dma_mmap(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
+ unsigned long attrs)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (dma_mmap_from_global_coherent(vma, cpu_addr, size, &ret))
+ return ret;
+
+ return dma_common_mmap(dev, vma, cpu_addr, dma_addr, size);
+}
+
+
static void __dma_page_cpu_to_dev(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
@@ -173,6 +199,7 @@ static void arm_nommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist
const struct dma_map_ops arm_nommu_dma_ops = {
.alloc = arm_nommu_dma_alloc,
.free = arm_nommu_dma_free,
+ .mmap = arm_nommu_dma_mmap,
.map_page = arm_nommu_dma_map_page,
.unmap_page = arm_nommu_dma_unmap_page,
.map_sg = arm_nommu_dma_map_sg,
--
2.0.0
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list