[PATCH 2/7] staging: fsl-mc: use generic memory barriers
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Mon Jul 17 06:38:01 PDT 2017
On 17/07/17 14:26, laurentiu.tudor at nxp.com wrote:
> From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor at nxp.com>
>
> No need to use arch-specific memory barriers; switch to using generic
> ones. The rmb()s were useless so drop them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor at nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-sys.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-sys.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-sys.c
> index a1704c3..012abd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/mc-sys.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ static inline void mc_write_command(struct mc_command __iomem *portal,
> /* copy command parameters into the portal */
> for (i = 0; i < MC_CMD_NUM_OF_PARAMS; i++)
> __raw_writeq(cmd->params[i], &portal->params[i]);
> - __iowmb();
> + /* ensure command params are committed before submitting it */
> + wmb();
>
> /* submit the command by writing the header */
> __raw_writeq(cmd->header, &portal->header);
AFAICS, just using writeq() here should ensure sufficient order against
the previous iomem accessors, without the need for explicit barriers.
Also, note that the __raw_*() variants aren't endian-safe, so consider
updating things to *_relaxed() where ordering doesn't matter.
Robin.
> @@ -150,9 +151,7 @@ static inline enum mc_cmd_status mc_read_response(struct mc_command __iomem *
> enum mc_cmd_status status;
>
> /* Copy command response header from MC portal: */
> - __iormb();
> resp->header = __raw_readq(&portal->header);
> - __iormb();
> status = mc_cmd_hdr_read_status(resp);
> if (status != MC_CMD_STATUS_OK)
> return status;
> @@ -160,7 +159,6 @@ static inline enum mc_cmd_status mc_read_response(struct mc_command __iomem *
> /* Copy command response data from MC portal: */
> for (i = 0; i < MC_CMD_NUM_OF_PARAMS; i++)
> resp->params[i] = __raw_readq(&portal->params[i]);
> - __iormb();
>
> return status;
> }
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list