[PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: add support for new ACPI HID QCOM8002
Timur Tabi
timur at codeaurora.org
Fri Jul 14 11:30:50 PDT 2017
On 07/14/2017 12:21 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> +enum {
>> + QDF2XXX_V1,
>> + QDF2XXX_V2,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id qdf2xxx_acpi_ids[] = {
>> + {"QCOM8001", QDF2XXX_V1},
>> + {"QCOM8002", QDF2XXX_V2},
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, qdf2xxx_acpi_ids);
>
> NB. too bad there doesn't seem to be an equivalent of
> of_device_get_match_data().
There's acpi_match_device(), which I use.
>
>> +
>> static int qdf2xxx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> + const struct acpi_device_id *id =
>> + acpi_match_device(qdf2xxx_acpi_ids, &pdev->dev);
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
>> struct msm_pingroup *groups;
>> char (*names)[NAME_SIZE];
>> unsigned int i;
>
> The result of the patch looks fine, but unfortunately there's some noise
> in the patch due to the transition from &pdev->dev to dev and num_gpios
> to max_gpios.
I did that to shrink the line lengths. I can put it back if you want.
>
>> - u32 num_gpios;
>> + unsigned int num_gpios; /* The number of GPIOs we support */
>> + u32 max_gpios; /* The highest number GPIO that exists */
>
> Could you please keep the "num_gpios" naming and name the new variable
> "avail_gpios" or something similar.
Sure.
>
>> + u16 *gpios; /* An array of supported GPIOs */
>> int ret;
>
>>
>> - /* Query the number of GPIOs from ACPI */
>> - ret = device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "num-gpios", &num_gpios);
>> + /* The total number of GPIOs that exist */
>> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "num-gpios", &max_gpios);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "missing num-gpios property\n");
>> + dev_err(dev, "missing or invalid 'num-gpios' property\n");
>
> While this makes sense it's not entirely related to this patch. My
> suggestion is that you prepend a patch transitioning &pdev->dev to dev
> and change these to dev_err in the same.
I'd rather put pdev->dev back.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list