[PATCH RESEND] arm64: arch_timer: fix the infinite recursion when enable ftrace and erratum workaround
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Mon Jul 10 06:54:27 PDT 2017
On 10/07/17 12:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 04:30:54PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> When enable preempt and debug ftrace, and perform the following steps, the
>> system will hang:
>> mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/
>> cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
>> echo function_graph > current_tracer
>>
>> This is because tracing the preempt_disable/enable calls would cause
>> trace_clock() which would get local timer to go into infinite recursion
>> when enable the arch timer erratum workaround for some chips, so Prevent
>> tracing of preempt_disable/enable() in arch_timer_reg_read_stable().
>>
>> This problem is similar to the fixed by upstream commit 96b3d28bf4
>> ("sched/clock: Prevent tracing recursion in sched_clock_cpu()").
>
> As I mentioned before, the patch itself looks fine to me, but the commit
> message is somewhat difficult to read.
>
> Can we please change this to:
>
> arm64: arch_timer: avoid infinite recursion when ftrace is enabled
>
> On platforms with an arch timer erratum workaround, it's possible for
> arch_timer_reg_read_stable() to recurse into itself when certain
> tracing options are enabled, leading to stack overflows and related
> problems.
>
> For example, when PREEMPT_TRACER and FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER are
> selected, it's possible to trigger this with:
>
> $ mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/
> $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer
>
> The problem is that in such cases, preempt_disable() instrumentation
> attempts to acquire a timestamp via trace_clock(), resulting in a call
> back to arch_timer_reg_read_stable(), and hence recursion.
>
> This patch changes arch_timer_reg_read_stable() to use
> preempt_{disable,enable}_notrace(), which avoids this.
>
> With that commit message:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
>
> Daniel, Thomas, would you be happy to fold that in when picking this? Or
> would you prefer that I fix this up and resend?
With the proposed changes:
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list