[PATCH 6/7] arm64: arch_timer: document Hisilicon erratum 161010101
Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Tue Jan 31 10:13:14 PST 2017
On 31/01/2017 15:29, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:19:55PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong at huawei.com>
>>
>> Now that we have a workaround for Hisilicon erratum 161010101, notes
>> this in the arm64 silicon-errata document.
>>
>> The new config option is too long to fit in the existing kconfig column,
>> so this is widened to accomodate it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong at huawei.com>
>> [Mark: split patch, reword commit message]
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
>> index 4a5e6cc..e12c926 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
>> @@ -63,3 +63,5 @@ stable kernels.
>> | Cavium | ThunderX SMMUv2 | #27704 | N/A |
>> | | | | |
>> | Freescale/NXP | LS2080A/LS1043A | A-008585 | FSL_ERRATUM_A008585 |
>> +| | | | |
>> +| Hisilicon | Hip0{5,6,7} | #161010101 | HISILICON_ERRATUM_161010101 |
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>
> I'd like to take this one via arm64, then you can drop it along with the
> first patch in the series and I can deal with the conflicts in the text
> file.
>
> Daniel, are you ok with that? This file isn't part of the clocksource
> code and is purely an informative document that we maintain to help ARM
> vendors know which errata we're working around.
Yes, no problem.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list