[GIT PULL] STM32 DT changes for v4.11 #1 V2

[Olof Johansson]

Hi Alexandre,

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:40:41PM +0100, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Hi Olof, Arnd and Kevin,
> 
> Please consider this second version of first round of STM32 DT updates for
> v4.11:
> 
> The following changes since commit 7ce7d89f48834cefece7804d38fc5d85382edf77:
> 
>   Linux 4.10-rc1 (2016-12-25 16:13:08 -0800)
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/atorgue/stm32.git
> tags/stm32-dt-for-v4.11-1-v2
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to a4e6964a78946bf3ce969d9fef5f201e0236f0ea:
> 
>   ARM: dts: stm32: enable RTC on stm32429i-eval (2017-01-20 14:59:58 +0100)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> STM32 DT updates for v4.11, round 1 Version 2.
> 
> Highlights:
> ----------
> 
>  - ADD RTC support on STM32F429 MCU
>  - Enable RTC on STM32F469and STM32F429 boards
>  - ADD ADC support on STM32F429 MCU
>  - Enable ADC on STM32F429 Eval board
>  - Add I2S external clock
>  - Fix memory size for STM32F429 Disco
> 
> Note:
> -----
> First patch "clk: stm32f4: Update DT bindings documentation")
> has already been merged in clock tree. Compare to version 1
> git merge has been used to take this patch.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Alexandre TORGUE (1):
>       Merge commit 'f8b5036361412a27c07a4ac9c3a4b80678cbd1e1' into
> stm32-dt-for-v4.11

Hm, this is slightly odd, and I'm not entirely sure what goes on here. So
please bear with me.

First, Stephen: This commit (f8b5036361412a27c07a4ac9c3a4b80678cbd1e1)
sits on top of a "random" commit from my view,
2aab7a2055a1705c9e30920d95a596226999eb21 ("clk: bcm: Fix
'maybe-uninitialized' warning in bcm2835_clock_choose_div_and_prate()"). This
isn't at an -rc*, and it's actually on a 4.9-rc base?!

Anyway, it doesn't really matter to me, as long as we know for sure that it's
on a stable base that won't move. Stephen, please confirm!

Alexandre: Sorry for the hassle, with the above confirmed we should finally be
OK to merge this.


-Olof