[PATCH v4] ARM: w90x900: let clk_disable() return immediately if clk is NULL

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Wan,

Ping again.

Please pick up this patch!

2016-11-06 0:45 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>:
> Hi Wan,
>
> This patch was acked by you long before,
> but it has not been pulled-in yet for some reasons.
>
> Now the patch was split per platform.
>
> So, could you apply this patch to your tree, please?
>
>
> 2016-09-19 2:59 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>:
>> In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
>> pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
>>
>> Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
>> clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
>> Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>>   - Split into per-arch patches
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>>   - Return only when clk is NULL.  Do not take care of error pointer.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>   - Rebase on Linux 4.6-rc1
>>
>>  arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
>> index 2c371ff..ac6fd1a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
>> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
>>  {
>>         unsigned long flags;
>>
>> +       if (!clk)
>> +               return;
>> +
>>         WARN_ON(clk->enabled == 0);
>>
>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&clocks_lock, flags);
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada