[PATCH v9 0/4] arm64: arch_timer: Add workaround for hisilicon-161010101 erratum
Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Mon Jan 23 14:40:27 PST 2017
On 23/01/2017 11:39, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:04:28PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:35:12PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>>> Ding Tianhong (4):
>>> arm64: arch_timer: Add device tree binding for hisilicon-161010101
>>> erratum
>>> arm64: arch_timer: Introduce a generic erratum handing mechanism for
>>> fsl-a008585
>>> arm64: arch_timer: Work around Erratum Hisilicon-161010101
>>> arm64: arch timer: Add timer erratum property for Hip05-d02 and
>>> Hip06-d03
>>>
>>> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 --
>>> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 43 +++---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt | 6 +
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip05.dtsi | 1 +
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip06.dtsi | 1 +
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 38 ++----
>>> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 18 +++
>>> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 150 +++++++++++++++------
>>> 8 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
>>
>> I've picked these up (with a few local cleanups), given that some local
>> testing, and pushed the result to a branch [1] on my git repo.
>>
>> There are likely to be clashes with the arm64 tree (e.g. for
>> silicon-errata.txt), and we're also likely to have more arch timer
>> updates shortly for the GTDT stuff, so I think the best bet is for both
>> arm64 and the clocksource tree to pull that branch for v4.11.
>>
>> Alternatively, we could take this all through the arm64 tree, if the
>> clocksource maintainers are happy with that.
>
> Fine by me, but I'd need at least Daniel's ack before taking these.
Ok, I will have a look at them tomorrow.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list