[PATCH v10 6/8] arm/arm64: vgic: Implement VGICv3 CPU interface access

[Christoffer Dall]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 06:05:33PM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Vijaya, Christoffer,
> 
> On 01/12/2016 08:09, vijay.kilari at gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar at cavium.com>
> > 
> > VGICv3 CPU interface registers are accessed using
> > KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS ioctl. These registers are accessed
> > as 64-bit. The cpu MPIDR value is passed along with register id.
> > is used to identify the cpu for registers access.
> > 
> > The VM that supports SEIs expect it on destination machine to handle
> > guest aborts and hence checked for ICC_CTLR_EL1.SEIS compatibility.
> > Similarly, VM that supports Affinity Level 3 that is required for AArch64
> > mode, is required to be supported on destination machine. Hence checked
> > for ICC_CTLR_EL1.A3V compatibility.
> > 
> > The arch/arm64/kvm/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c handles read and write of VGIC
> > CPU registers for AArch64.
> > 
> > For AArch32 mode, arch/arm/kvm/vgic-v3-coproc.c file is created but
> > APIs are not implemented.
> > 
> > Updated arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h with new definitions
> > required to compile for AArch32.
> > 
> > The version of VGIC v3 specification is define here
> > Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic-v3.txt
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin at samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar at cavium.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h     |   2 +
> >  arch/arm/kvm/Makefile               |   4 +-
> >  arch/arm/kvm/vgic-v3-coproc.c       |  35 ++++
> >  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h   |   3 +
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile             |   3 +-
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c    | 338 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h              |   9 +
> >  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c |  28 +++
> >  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c    |  18 ++
> >  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c         |   8 +
> >  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h            |   4 +
> >  11 files changed, 449 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > index 0ae6035..98658d9d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > @@ -186,9 +186,11 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> >  			(0xffffffffULL << KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_V3_MPIDR_SHIFT)
> >  #define   KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_OFFSET_SHIFT	0
> >  #define   KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_OFFSET_MASK	(0xffffffffULL << KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_OFFSET_SHIFT)
> > +#define   KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG_INSTR_MASK (0xffff)
> >  #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_NR_IRQS	3
> >  #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL       4
> >  #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_REDIST_REGS 5
> > +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS    6
> nit: arm-vgic-v3.txt spec uses that name. To be homogeneous with other
> groups, shouldn't we correct this into KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CPU_SYSREGS?

Yeah, probably, as long as we use the same naming scheme and have the
docs and code in sync, I'm fine with this.

Thanks,
-Christoffer