[PATCH 1/4] ARM: mmu: decouple VECTORS_BASE from Kconfig
Afzal Mohammed
afzal.mohd.ma at gmail.com
Fri Jan 20 08:06:18 PST 2017
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 02:24:24PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 02:07:39AM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote:
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
> > +#define VECTORS_BASE 0xffff0000
>
> This should be UL(0xffff0000)
> > - MLK(UL(CONFIG_VECTORS_BASE), UL(CONFIG_VECTORS_BASE) +
> > - (PAGE_SIZE)),
> > + MLK(UL(VECTORS_BASE), UL(VECTORS_BASE) + (PAGE_SIZE)),
>
> which means you don't need it here, which will then fix the build error
> reported by the 0-day builder.
Seems there is some confusion here,
VECTORS_BASE definition above in memory.h is enclosed within
CONFIG_MMU. Robot used a no-MMU defconfig, it didn't get a
VECTORS_BASE definition at this patch, causing the build error. Our
dear robot mentioned that my HEAD didn't break build, but
bisectability is broken at this point.
With "PATCH 3/4 ARM: nommu: display vectors base", the above is
changed to
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
MLK(UL(VECTORS_BASE), UL(VECTORS_BASE) + (PAGE_SIZE)),
#else
...
#endif
thus making the series build again for no-MMU
One option to keep bisectability would be to squash this with PATCH
3/4, but i think a better & natural solution would be define
VECTORS_BASE outside of
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
...
#else
...
#endif
and then in PATCH 3/4, move VECTORS_BASE to be inside
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
...
#else
Regards
afzal
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list