[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: gpu: Add Mali Utgard bindings
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Tue Jan 17 03:33:57 PST 2017
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Neil Armstrong
<narmstrong at baylibre.com> wrote:
> On 01/17/2017 10:38 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 08:49:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>> The ARM Mali Utgard GPU family is embedded into a number of SoCs from
>>>> Allwinner, Amlogic, Mediatek or Rockchip.
>>>>
>>>> Add a binding for the GPU of that family.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-utgard.txt
>>>
>>> Do you have a driver in kernel which will implement these bindings?
>>
>> No, but we have bindings for out-of-tree drivers already.
>>
>>> Defining them for out-of-tree driver does not bring any benefits
>>> (3rd party driver will not respect them anyway).
>>
>> You could see it the other way around too. The out-of-tree drivers
>> don't respect it at the moment because there's no binding to respect.
>>
>> And at least for us, we definitely plan on doing that.
>>
>> Maxime
>
> Hi Maxime, Krzysztof,
>
> We hope this will be accepted so it will solve the same issue we have on Amlogic SoCs
> and all the other mali powered SoCs.
It will be helpful also for other SoCs using Mali 400 (e.g.
Exynos3250, Exynos4412).
> Having mainline bindings will forcre out-of-tree driver to respect those bindings
> and remove a dts out-of-tree patch aswell.
I would argue here over the word "force". Having bindings defined here
does not force anyone into anything. The out-of-tree can do whatever
they want. It is a wish from kernel side - it might be respected but
it might not.
Just to be sure - I am not opposed against. Some time ago I wanted
Mali400 to be upstreamed but with current policy about user-space side
it is not possible.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list