[PATCH V9 0/3] irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver
guohanjun at huawei.com
Mon Jan 16 06:41:26 PST 2017
On 2017/1/16 22:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 16/01/17 14:07, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>> On 2017-01-03 16:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Agustin Vega-Frias
>>> <agustinv at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> Is there any more feedback on this beyond Lorenzo's suggestion to drop
>>>> the conditional check on the first patch?
>>>> How can we move forward on this series?
>>> Essentially, I need to convince myself that patches [1-2/3] are fine
>>> which hasn't happened yet.
>> Pinging again. Do you have any questions that might help with your
>> review? I have some minor changes I have to make to the driver itself
>> (patch 3) and I'd like to submit any changes you might want along with
> I'd like to add that these two initial patches are now a prerequisite
> for Hanjun's series, so it'd be good to have an idea of where we're
> going on that front.
Is it helpful to test patch [1-2/3] on x86 machines (with different firmware) and
an IA64 machine (surely a different version of firmware :) ) with Lorenzo's suggestion
of removing #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI for is_gsi()? If yes, I can do that as
I have such machines.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel