[PATCH net-next v3 06/10] net: dsa: Migrate to device_find_class()

[Greg KH]

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 09:27:22AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/15/2017 03:06 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:47:09PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> Now that the base device driver code provides an identical
> >> implementation of dev_find_class() utilize device_find_class() instead
> >> of our own version of it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  net/dsa/dsa.c | 22 ++--------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> >> index 2306d1b87c83..77fa4c4f5828 100644
> >> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> >> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> >> @@ -455,29 +455,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_switch_resume);
> >>  #endif
> >>  
> >>  /* platform driver init and cleanup *****************************************/
> >> -static int dev_is_class(struct device *dev, void *class)
> >> -{
> >> -	if (dev->class != NULL && !strcmp(dev->class->name, class))
> >> -		return 1;
> >> -
> >> -	return 0;
> >> -}
> >> -
> >> -static struct device *dev_find_class(struct device *parent, char *class)
> >> -{
> >> -	if (dev_is_class(parent, class)) {
> >> -		get_device(parent);
> >> -		return parent;
> >> -	}
> >> -
> >> -	return device_find_child(parent, class, dev_is_class);
> >> -}
> >> -
> >>  struct mii_bus *dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(struct device *dev)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct device *d;
> >>  
> >> -	d = dev_find_class(dev, "mdio_bus");
> >> +	d = device_find_class(dev, "mdio_bus");
> >>  	if (d != NULL) {
> >>  		struct mii_bus *bus;
> > 
> > You want a peer of your device on a specific class?  What is this for?
> 
> It's not a peer of our device, it's a separate device reference from the
> one looked up in the "net" class. In the classic, and now deprecated DSA
> device driver model, a "dsa" platform device would represent one or more
> Ethernet switches, connected via a MDIO bus (this reference above), and
> one Ethernet device (the CPU/host/management interface). This was
> completely violating the Linux device driver model and imposed
> limitations on what bus would be used, and we did not have proper struct
> device references (therefore no adequate hierarchy either).
> 
> Thanks to the work of Andrew, we now have proper MDIO, SPI, GPIO, I2C,
> PCI, platform and drivers that allow us to register with DSA as a
> specialized kind of device (so we are now finally using the right Linux
> Device Driver model). What we still need though, in order to our switch
> to the networking stack is a reference to the master/host network device
> since we mangle packets in and out of it.

Ok, but where in the tree are you trying to find this other device?  Are
you just going to randomly find any device that happens to be of the
specific class type?  That seems really fragile and broken :(

You should NEVER have to walk the device tree to find stuff.  Why can't
you have a pointer to the device you need to talk to some other way?

What exactly is the relationship between these devices (a ascii-art tree
or sysfs tree output might be nice) so I can try to understand what is
going on here.

thanks,

greg k-h