[PATCH v1 2/2] arm: dts: mt2701: add nor flash node
Matthias Brugger
matthias.bgg at gmail.com
Fri Jan 13 07:12:20 PST 2017
On 13/01/17 15:17, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:13:29 +0800
> Guochun Mao <guochun.mao at mediatek.com> wrote:
>
>> Add Mediatek nor flash node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guochun Mao <guochun.mao at mediatek.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts
>> index 082ca88..85e5ae8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts
>> @@ -24,6 +24,31 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> +&nor_flash {
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&nor_pins_default>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + flash at 0 {
>> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> +&pio {
>> + nor_pins_default: nor {
>> + pins1 {
>> + pinmux = <MT2701_PIN_240_EXT_XCS__FUNC_EXT_XCS>,
>> + <MT2701_PIN_241_EXT_SCK__FUNC_EXT_SCK>,
>> + <MT2701_PIN_239_EXT_SDIO0__FUNC_EXT_SDIO0>,
>> + <MT2701_PIN_238_EXT_SDIO1__FUNC_EXT_SDIO1>,
>> + <MT2701_PIN_237_EXT_SDIO2__FUNC_EXT_SDIO2>,
>> + <MT2701_PIN_236_EXT_SDIO3__FUNC_EXT_SDIO3>;
>> + drive-strength = <MTK_DRIVE_4mA>;
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> &uart0 {
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi
>> index bdf8954..1eefce4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi
>> @@ -227,6 +227,18 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> + nor_flash: spi at 11014000 {
>> + compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-nor",
>> + "mediatek,mt8173-nor";
>
> Why define both here? Is "mediatek,mt8173-nor" really providing a
> subset of the features supported by "mediatek,mt2701-nor"?
>
I think even if the ip block is the same, we should provide both
bindings, just in case in the future we find out that mt2701 has some
hidden bug, feature or bug-feature. This way even if we update the
driver, we stay compatible with older device tree blobs in the wild.
We can drop the mt2701-nor in the bindings definition if you want.
Regards,
Matthias
>> + reg = <0 0x11014000 0 0xe0>;
>> + clocks = <&pericfg CLK_PERI_FLASH>,
>> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_FLASH_SEL>;
>> + clock-names = "spi", "sf";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> mmsys: syscon at 14000000 {
>> compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-mmsys", "syscon";
>> reg = <0 0x14000000 0 0x1000>;
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list