[PATCH 1/2] mmc: mediatek: Use data tune for CMD line tune
Yong Mao
yong.mao at mediatek.com
Fri Jan 13 02:17:42 PST 2017
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 11:39 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 12 January 2017 at 11:04, Yong Mao <yong.mao at mediatek.com> wrote:
> > From: yong mao <yong.mao at mediatek.com>
> >
> > CMD response CRC error may cause cannot boot up
> > Change to use data tune for CMD line
> > Separate cmd internal delay for HS200/HS400 mode
>
> Please try to work a little bit on improving the change log. Moreover
> as this is a fix for a regression (it seems like so?), please try to
> make that clear.
This change can fix CMD respose CRC issue in our platform.
I will try to make it clear in next version.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Mao <yong.mao at mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-evb.dts | 3 +
>
> Changes to the DTS files should be a separate change. Please split it
> into its own patch.
>
> > drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-evb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-evb.dts
> > index 0ecaad4..29c3100 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-evb.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-evb.dts
> > @@ -134,6 +134,9 @@
> > bus-width = <8>;
> > max-frequency = <50000000>;
> > cap-mmc-highspeed;
> > + hs200-cmd-int-delay = <26>;
> > + hs400-cmd-int-delay = <14>;
> > + cmd-resp-sel = <0>; /* 0: rising, 1: falling */
> > vmmc-supply = <&mt6397_vemc_3v3_reg>;
> > vqmmc-supply = <&mt6397_vio18_reg>;
> > non-removable;
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> > index 80ba034..93eb395 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
> > #define MSDC_PATCH_BIT1 0xb4
> > #define MSDC_PAD_TUNE 0xec
> > #define PAD_DS_TUNE 0x188
> > +#define PAD_CMD_TUNE 0x18c
> > #define EMMC50_CFG0 0x208
> >
> > /*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> > @@ -210,12 +211,17 @@
> > #define MSDC_PATCH_BIT_SPCPUSH (0x1 << 29) /* RW */
> > #define MSDC_PATCH_BIT_DECRCTMO (0x1 << 30) /* RW */
> >
> > -#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE_DATRRDLY (0x1f << 8) /* RW */
> > -#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY (0x1f << 16) /* RW */
> > +#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE_DATWRDLY (0x1f << 0) /* RW */
> > +#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE_DATRRDLY (0x1f << 8) /* RW */
> > +#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY (0x1f << 16) /* RW */
> > +#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRRDLY (0x1f << 22) /* RW */
>
> Is there a white space change somewhere here? I don't see any changes
> to MSDC_PAD_TUNE_DATRRDLY and MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY.
>
Sorry. I will fix in next version.
> > +#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CLKTDLY (0x1f << 27) /* RW */
> >
> > -#define PAD_DS_TUNE_DLY1 (0x1f << 2) /* RW */
> > -#define PAD_DS_TUNE_DLY2 (0x1f << 7) /* RW */
> > -#define PAD_DS_TUNE_DLY3 (0x1f << 12) /* RW */
> > +#define PAD_DS_TUNE_DLY1 (0x1f << 2) /* RW */
> > +#define PAD_DS_TUNE_DLY2 (0x1f << 7) /* RW */
> > +#define PAD_DS_TUNE_DLY3 (0x1f << 12) /* RW */
> > +
>
> Ditto.
Ditto.
>
> > +#define PAD_CMD_TUNE_RX_DLY3 (0x1f << 1) /* RW */
> >
> > #define EMMC50_CFG_PADCMD_LATCHCK (0x1 << 0) /* RW */
> > #define EMMC50_CFG_CRCSTS_EDGE (0x1 << 3) /* RW */
> > @@ -236,7 +242,9 @@
> > #define CMD_TIMEOUT (HZ/10 * 5) /* 100ms x5 */
> > #define DAT_TIMEOUT (HZ * 5) /* 1000ms x5 */
> >
> > -#define PAD_DELAY_MAX 32 /* PAD delay cells */
> > +#define PAD_DELAY_MAX 32 /* PAD delay cells */
>
> Ditto.
>
Ditto.
> > +#define ENOUGH_MARGIN_MIN 12 /* Enough Margin */
> > +#define PREFER_START_POS_MAX 4 /* Prefer start position */
> > /*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> > /* Descriptor Structure */
> > /*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> > @@ -284,12 +292,14 @@ struct msdc_save_para {
> > u32 patch_bit0;
> > u32 patch_bit1;
> > u32 pad_ds_tune;
> > + u32 pad_cmd_tune;
> > u32 emmc50_cfg0;
> > };
> >
> > struct msdc_tune_para {
> > u32 iocon;
> > u32 pad_tune;
> > + u32 pad_cmd_tune;
> > };
> >
> > struct msdc_delay_phase {
> > @@ -331,6 +341,9 @@ struct msdc_host {
> > unsigned char timing;
> > bool vqmmc_enabled;
> > u32 hs400_ds_delay;
> > + u32 hs200_cmd_int_delay; /* cmd internal delay for HS200/SDR104 */
> > + u32 hs400_cmd_int_delay; /* cmd internal delay for HS400 */
> > + u32 hs200_cmd_resp_sel; /* cmd response sample selection */
> > bool hs400_mode; /* current eMMC will run at hs400 mode */
> > struct msdc_save_para save_para; /* used when gate HCLK */
> > struct msdc_tune_para def_tune_para; /* default tune setting */
> > @@ -596,12 +609,21 @@ static void msdc_set_mclk(struct msdc_host *host, unsigned char timing, u32 hz)
> > */
> > if (host->sclk <= 52000000) {
> > writel(host->def_tune_para.iocon, host->base + MSDC_IOCON);
> > - writel(host->def_tune_para.pad_tune, host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE);
> > + writel(host->def_tune_para.pad_tune,
> > + host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE);
>
> Please don't change code just because you feel like doing it. This is
> a completely unessarry change and it makes it harder for me to review.
>
> Can you go thorugh the complete patch and make sure to undo all
> similar changes, there are more of them.
>
Sorry. I will fix in next version.
> > } else {
> > - writel(host->saved_tune_para.iocon, host->base + MSDC_IOCON);
> > - writel(host->saved_tune_para.pad_tune, host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE);
> > + writel(host->saved_tune_para.iocon,
> > + host->base + MSDC_IOCON);
> > + writel(host->saved_tune_para.pad_tune,
> > + host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE);
> > + writel(host->saved_tune_para.pad_cmd_tune,
> > + host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE);
> > }
> >
> > + if (timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400)
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE,
> > + MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRRDLY,
> > + host->hs400_cmd_int_delay);
> > dev_dbg(host->dev, "sclk: %d, timing: %d\n", host->sclk, timing);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1302,7 +1324,8 @@ static struct msdc_delay_phase get_best_delay(struct msdc_host *host, u32 delay)
> > len_final = len;
> > }
> > start += len ? len : 1;
> > - if (len >= 8 && start_final < 4)
> > + if (len >= ENOUGH_MARGIN_MIN &&
> > + start_final < PREFER_START_POS_MAX)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1325,48 +1348,128 @@ static int msdc_tune_response(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> > struct msdc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> > u32 rise_delay = 0, fall_delay = 0;
> > struct msdc_delay_phase final_rise_delay, final_fall_delay = { 0,};
> > + struct msdc_delay_phase internal_delay_phase;
> > u8 final_delay, final_maxlen;
> > + u32 internal_delay = 0;
> > int cmd_err;
> > - int i;
> > + int i, j;
> >
> > + if (mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200 ||
> > + mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104)
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
> > + MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRRDLY,
> > + host->hs200_cmd_int_delay);
> > sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_RSPL);
> > for (i = 0 ; i < PAD_DELAY_MAX; i++) {
> > sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
> > MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY, i);
> > - mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, &cmd_err);
> > - if (!cmd_err)
> > - rise_delay |= (1 << i);
> > + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
>
> Any reason to why looping three times makes sense? Maybe add a comment?
>
Using the same parameters, it may sometimes pass the test,
but sometimes it may fail. To make sure the parameters is
more stable, we test 3 times for on set of parameters.
Anyway, I will add comment here in next version.
> > + mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, &cmd_err);
> > + if (!cmd_err) {
> > + rise_delay |= (1 << i);
> > + } else {
> > + rise_delay &= ~(1 << i);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > }
> > final_rise_delay = get_best_delay(host, rise_delay);
> > /* if rising edge has enough margin, then do not scan falling edge */
> > - if (final_rise_delay.maxlen >= 10 ||
> > - (final_rise_delay.start == 0 && final_rise_delay.maxlen >= 4))
> > + if (final_rise_delay.maxlen >= ENOUGH_MARGIN_MIN &&
> > + final_rise_delay.start < PREFER_START_POS_MAX)
>
> This looks like clean-ups, as you are converting from magic numbers to
> defines. Please make this kind of changes separately.
I will drop this change in next version.
>
> > goto skip_fall;
> >
> > sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_RSPL);
> > for (i = 0; i < PAD_DELAY_MAX; i++) {
> > sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
> > MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY, i);
> > - mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, &cmd_err);
> > - if (!cmd_err)
> > - fall_delay |= (1 << i);
> > + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
>
> 3?
>
> > + mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, &cmd_err);
> > + if (!cmd_err) {
> > + fall_delay |= (1 << i);
> > + } else {
> > + fall_delay &= ~(1 << i);
> > + break;
> > + };
> > + }
> > }
> > final_fall_delay = get_best_delay(host, fall_delay);
> >
> > skip_fall:
> > final_maxlen = max(final_rise_delay.maxlen, final_fall_delay.maxlen);
> > + if (final_fall_delay.maxlen >= ENOUGH_MARGIN_MIN &&
> > + final_fall_delay.start < PREFER_START_POS_MAX)
> > + final_maxlen = final_fall_delay.maxlen;
> > if (final_maxlen == final_rise_delay.maxlen) {
> > sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_RSPL);
> > - sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE, MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY,
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
> > + MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY,
> > final_rise_delay.final_phase);
> > final_delay = final_rise_delay.final_phase;
> > } else {
> > sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_RSPL);
> > - sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE, MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY,
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
> > + MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY,
> > final_fall_delay.final_phase);
> > final_delay = final_fall_delay.final_phase;
> > }
> > + if (host->hs200_cmd_int_delay)
> > + goto skip_internal;
> >
> > + for (i = 0; i < PAD_DELAY_MAX; i++) {
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
> > + MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRRDLY, i);
> > + mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, &cmd_err);
> > + if (!cmd_err)
> > + internal_delay |= (1 << i);
> > + }
> > + dev_info(host->dev, "Final internal delay: 0x%x\n", internal_delay);
>
> I don't think dev_info() is what you want, right? Perhaps dev_dbg(),
> anything at all.
>
Yes. We should use dev_dbg() here. Will be fixed in next version.
> > + internal_delay_phase = get_best_delay(host, internal_delay);
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE, MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRRDLY,
> > + internal_delay_phase.final_phase);
> > +skip_internal:
> > + dev_info(host->dev, "Final cmd pad delay: %x\n", final_delay);
>
> I don't think dev_info() is what you want, right? Perhaps dev_dbg(),
> anything at all.
>
Yes. We should use dev_dbg() here. Will be fixed in next version.
> > + return final_delay == 0xff ? -EIO : 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int hs400_tune_response(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> > +{
> > + struct msdc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> > + u32 cmd_delay = 0;
> > + struct msdc_delay_phase final_cmd_delay = { 0,};
> > + u8 final_delay;
> > + int cmd_err;
> > + int i, j;
> > +
> > + /* select EMMC50 PAD CMD tune */
> > + sdr_set_bits(host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE, BIT(0));
> > +
> > + if (mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200 ||
> > + mmc->ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104)
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE,
> > + MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRRDLY,
> > + host->hs200_cmd_int_delay);
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_IOCON, MSDC_IOCON_RSPL,
> > + host->hs200_cmd_resp_sel);
> > + for (i = 0 ; i < PAD_DELAY_MAX; i++) {
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE,
> > + PAD_CMD_TUNE_RX_DLY3, i);
> > + for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
>
> 3?
>
> > + mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, &cmd_err);
> > + if (!cmd_err) {
> > + cmd_delay |= (1 << i);
> > + } else {
> > + cmd_delay &= ~(1 << i);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + final_cmd_delay = get_best_delay(host, cmd_delay);
> > + sdr_set_field(host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE, PAD_CMD_TUNE_RX_DLY3,
> > + final_cmd_delay.final_phase);
> > + final_delay = final_cmd_delay.final_phase;
> > +
> > + dev_info(host->dev, "Final cmd pad delay: %x\n", final_delay);
>
> dev_info() -> dev_dbg() or remove it.
We will use dev_dbg() instead of dev_info(). Will be fixed in next
version.
>
> > return final_delay == 0xff ? -EIO : 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1389,7 +1492,7 @@ static int msdc_tune_data(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> > }
> > final_rise_delay = get_best_delay(host, rise_delay);
> > /* if rising edge has enough margin, then do not scan falling edge */
> > - if (final_rise_delay.maxlen >= 10 ||
> > + if (final_rise_delay.maxlen >= ENOUGH_MARGIN_MIN ||
>
> Clean up. Move to separate change.
>
Will drop it in current change.
> > (final_rise_delay.start == 0 && final_rise_delay.maxlen >= 4))
> > goto skip_fall;
> >
> > @@ -1422,6 +1525,7 @@ static int msdc_tune_data(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> > final_delay = final_fall_delay.final_phase;
> > }
> >
> > + dev_info(host->dev, "Final data pad delay: %x\n", final_delay);
>
> dev_info() -> dev_dbg() or remove it.
>
We will use dev_dbg() instead of dev_info(). Will be fixed in next
version.
> > return final_delay == 0xff ? -EIO : 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1430,10 +1534,13 @@ static int msdc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> > struct msdc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> > int ret;
> >
> > + if (host->hs400_mode)
> > + ret = hs400_tune_response(mmc, opcode);
> > + else
> > ret = msdc_tune_response(mmc, opcode);
>
> Because of the new else clause, seems like above needs an intendation.
>
Sorry. Will be fixed in next version.
> > if (ret == -EIO) {
> > dev_err(host->dev, "Tune response fail!\n");
> > - return ret;
> > + goto out;
>
> Not needed, remove the label and this change.
>
Will drop it in this change.
> > }
> > if (host->hs400_mode == false) {
> > ret = msdc_tune_data(mmc, opcode);
> > @@ -1443,6 +1550,8 @@ static int msdc_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
> >
> > host->saved_tune_para.iocon = readl(host->base + MSDC_IOCON);
> > host->saved_tune_para.pad_tune = readl(host->base + MSDC_PAD_TUNE);
> > + host->saved_tune_para.pad_cmd_tune = readl(host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE);
> > +out:
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1553,6 +1662,18 @@ static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "hs400-ds-delay: %x\n",
> > host->hs400_ds_delay);
> >
> > + if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "hs200-cmd-int-delay",
> > + &host->hs200_cmd_int_delay))
> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "host->hs200-cmd-int-delay: %x\n",
> > + host->hs200_cmd_int_delay);
> > + if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "hs400-cmd-int-delay",
> > + &host->hs400_cmd_int_delay))
> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "host->hs400-cmd-int-delay: %x\n",
> > + host->hs400_cmd_int_delay);
> > + if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "cmd-resp-sel",
> > + &host->hs200_cmd_resp_sel))
> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "host->hs200_cmd-resp-sel: %x\n",
> > + host->hs200_cmd_resp_sel);
>
> I suggest you take the oppotunity to move the MTK DTS parsing into its
> own function, include the existing parsing of the "hs400-ds-delay".
> This improve the readablitity of the code.
>
Thanks. We will move all of MTK DTS parsing into msdc_of_property_parse
function.
> > host->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > host->mmc = mmc;
> > host->src_clk_freq = clk_get_rate(host->src_clk);
> > @@ -1663,6 +1784,7 @@ static void msdc_save_reg(struct msdc_host *host)
> > host->save_para.patch_bit0 = readl(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT);
> > host->save_para.patch_bit1 = readl(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT1);
> > host->save_para.pad_ds_tune = readl(host->base + PAD_DS_TUNE);
> > + host->save_para.pad_cmd_tune = readl(host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE);
> > host->save_para.emmc50_cfg0 = readl(host->base + EMMC50_CFG0);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1675,6 +1797,7 @@ static void msdc_restore_reg(struct msdc_host *host)
> > writel(host->save_para.patch_bit0, host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT);
> > writel(host->save_para.patch_bit1, host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT1);
> > writel(host->save_para.pad_ds_tune, host->base + PAD_DS_TUNE);
> > + writel(host->save_para.pad_cmd_tune, host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE);
> > writel(host->save_para.emmc50_cfg0, host->base + EMMC50_CFG0);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
Best Regards,
Yong Mao.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list