[PATCH] ARM64: dts: meson-gxbb-odroidc2: fix GbE tx link breakage
Jerome Brunet
jbrunet at baylibre.com
Fri Jan 13 01:55:09 PST 2017
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 16:52 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Jerome Brunet <jbrunet at baylibre.com> writes:
>
> >
> > OdroidC2 GbE link breaks under heavy tx transfer. This happens even
> > if the
> > MAC does not enable Energy Efficient Ethernet (No Low Power state
> > Idle on
> > the Tx path). The problem seems to come from the phy Rx path,
> > entering the
> > LPI state.
> >
> > Disabling EEE advertisement on the phy prevent this feature to be
> > negociated with the link partner and solve the issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet at baylibre.com>
> > ---
> >
> > This patch is based on Linus recent master branch [0]
> > This patch depends on the series [1] which has been merged in this
> > branch.
> >
> > 0: ba6d973f78eb ("Merge
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net")
> > 1: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480326409-25419-1-git-send-email-jbrun
> > et at baylibre.com
> > Fix integration of eee-broken-modes
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-odroidc2.dts | 12
> > ++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-odroidc2.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-odroidc2.dts
> > index 238fbeacd330..d8933e9e9a5a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-odroidc2.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-odroidc2.dts
> > @@ -147,6 +147,18 @@
> > status = "okay";
> > pinctrl-0 = <ð_rgmii_pins>;
> > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + phy-handle = <ð_phy0>;
> > +
> > + mdio {
> > + compatible = "snps,dwmac-mdio";
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + eth_phy0: ethernet-phy at 0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + eee-broken-1000t;
> > + };
> > + };
>
> There's already an MDIO node in the meson-gx.dtsi (using the same
> compatible), shouldn't you just override that and add the new
> properties?
Hum, yeah in the changes queued from 4.11, right ?
But not in the latest rc from Linus. Since this is a fix, it was
actually target for this branch.
I guess you'd prefer to avoid merge conflicts when the 4.10 is tagged.
How do you want to handle this ?
>
> What would make things easier is if the names were like Martin used
> in
> his reset patch, so that when I merge them together it's not a major
> conflict.
Sure, no problem. I'll change it to match what has been done by Martin.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9459409/
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list