[PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: exynos: Remove unneeded unit names in Exynos5433 nodes

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:38:32PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The "samsung,exynos5433-mipi-video-phy" and "samsung,exynos5250-dwusb3"
> DT bindings don't specify a reg property for these nodes, so having a
> unit name leads to the following DTC warnings:
> 
> Node /soc/video-phy at 105c0710 has a unit name, but no reg property
> Node /soc/usb at 15400000 has a unit name, but no reg property
> Node /soc/usb at 15a00000 has a unit name, but no reg property
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier at osg.samsung.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> index 3695ddaf2e04..17e5dafd392c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@
>  			interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 0xf04>;
>  		};
>  
> -		mipi_phy: video-phy at 105c0710 {
> +		mipi_phy: video-phy {
>  			compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-mipi-video-phy";
>  			#phy-cells = <1>;
>  			samsung,pmu-syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>;
> @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> -		usbdrd30: usb at 15400000  {
> +		usbdrd30: usb-0  {

How about "usbdrd" instead of "usb-0"? It would be still quite a generic
description of a class.

>  			compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dwusb3";
>  			clocks = <&cmu_fsys CLK_ACLK_USBDRD30>,
>  				<&cmu_fsys CLK_SCLK_USBDRD30>;
> @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> -		usbhost30: usb at 15a00000 {
> +		usbhost30: usb-1 {

usbhost?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

>  			compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dwusb3";
>  			clocks = <&cmu_fsys CLK_ACLK_USBHOST30>,
>  				<&cmu_fsys CLK_SCLK_USBHOST30>;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>