[PATCH v3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add "rockchip, grf" property for RK3399 PMUCRU/CRU
zhengxing at rock-chips.com
Mon Jan 9 19:31:02 PST 2017
On 2017年01月10日 11:06, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> The structure rockchip_clk_provider needs to refer the GRF regmap
>> in somewhere, if the CRU node has not "rockchip,grf" property,
>> calling syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle will return an invalid GRF
>> regmap, and the MUXGRF type clock will be not supported.
>> Therefore, we need to add them.
>> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing at rock-chips.com>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - add optional roperty rockchip,grf in rockchip,rk3399-cru.txt
>> Changes in v2:
>> - referring pmugrf for PMUGRU
>> - fix the typo "invaild" in COMMIT message
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3399-cru.txt | 5 +++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 2 ++
> "dts" and bindings shouldn't change in the same patch since they go
> through different trees. This is why I said:
>> This looks sane to me, but before you land it you need to first send
>> up a (separate) patch that adjusts:
> AKA: you need a two patch series here.
> Sometimes it's OK to include bindings together with code changes
> (depends on the maintainer), but never with dts changes.
For little lazy, I did refer other SoC platform to using "dts" and
bindings in the same patch...
OK, I will use a two patch series.
- Xing Zheng
More information about the linux-arm-kernel