[PATCH] clk: scpi: don't add cpufreq device if the scpi dvfs node is disabled

[Michał Zegan]

Of course.

W dniu 09.01.2017 o 10:58, Sudeep Holla pisze:
> 
> 
> On 07/01/17 00:44, Michał Zegan wrote:
>> seems the patch works as intended.
>>
> 
> So, can we take this as
> Tested-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200 at poczta.onet.pl> ?
> 
>> W dniu 06.01.2017 o 13:34, Sudeep Holla pisze:
>>> Currently we add the virtual cpufreq device unconditionally even when
>>> the SCPI DVFS clock provider node is disabled. This will cause cpufreq
>>> driver to throw errors when it gets initailised on boot/modprobe and
>>> also when the CPUs are hot-plugged back in.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the issue by adding the virtual cpufreq device only if
>>> the SCPI DVFS clock provider is available and registered.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 9490f01e2471 ("clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device")
>>> Reported-by: Michał Zegan <webczat_200 at poczta.onet.pl>
>>> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong at baylibre.com>
>>> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette at baylibre.com>
>>> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 525 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170109/26ff70dd/attachment.sig>