[PATCH v1 1/3] dt: bindings: add thermal device driver for zx2967
Shawn Guo
shawnguo at kernel.org
Sun Jan 8 18:41:37 PST 2017
On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 01:38:06PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch adds dt-binding documentation for zx2967 family thermal sensor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org>
The patch subject is inappropriate. The patch adds a bindings not
device driver.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/zx2967-thermal.txt | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/zx2967-thermal.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/zx2967-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/zx2967-thermal.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2633964
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/zx2967-thermal.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +* ZTE zx2967 family Thermal
> +
> +Required Properties:
> +- compatible: should be one of the following.
> + * zte,zx2967-thermal
> + * zte,zx296718-thermal
We usually use specific SoC name in compatible string to specify the
programming model for the hardware. That said, I do not think we need
"zte,zx2967-thermal".
> +- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
> + region.
> +- clocks : Pairs of phandle and specifier referencing the controller's clocks.
> +- clock-names: "tempsensor_gate" for the topcrm clock.
> + "tempsensor_pclk" for the apb clock.
In the context of tempsensor device, the "tempsensor_" in the clock
names are not really necessary.
> +- #thermal-sensor-cells: must be 0.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + tempsensor: tempsensor at 148a000 {
> + compatible = "zte,zx2967-thermal";
"zte,zx296718-thermal"
Shawn
> + reg = <0x0148a000 0x20>;
> + clocks = <&topcrm TEMPSENSOR_GATE>, <&audiocrm AUDIO_TS_PCLK>;
> + clock-names = "tempsensor_gate", "tempsensor_pclk";
> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
> + };
> --
> 2.7.4
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list