[PATCH v2 04/19] ARM: dts: imx6-sabrelite: add OV5642 and OV5640 camera sensors
Steve Longerbeam
slongerbeam at gmail.com
Thu Jan 5 11:20:57 PST 2017
Hi Vladimir,
On 01/04/2017 04:25 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On 01/03/2017 10:57 PM, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>> Enables the OV5642 parallel-bus sensor, and the OV5640 MIPI CSI-2 sensor.
>> Both hang off the same i2c2 bus, so they require different (and non-
>> default) i2c slave addresses.
>>
>> The OV5642 connects to the parallel-bus mux input port on ipu1_csi0_mux.
>>
>> The OV5640 connects to the input port on the MIPI CSI-2 receiver on
>> mipi_csi. It is set to transmit over MIPI virtual channel 1.
>>
>> Note there is a pin conflict with GPIO6. This pin functions as a power
>> input pin to the OV5642, but ENET uses it as the h/w workaround for
>> erratum ERR006687, to wake-up the ARM cores on normal RX and TX packet
>> done events (see 6261c4c8). So workaround 6261c4c8 is reverted here to
>> support the OV5642, and the "fsl,err006687-workaround-present" boolean
>> also must be removed. The result is that the CPUidle driver will no longer
>> allow entering the deep idle states on the sabrelite.
> For me it sounds like a candidate of its own separate change.
Yes, I split out the two partial reverts into a separate commit
("ARM: dts: imx6qdl-sabrelite: remove erratum ERR006687
workaround").
>
>
>
>> +
>> + mipi_camera: ov5640 at 40 {
> Please reorder device nodes by address value,
done.
> also according to ePAPR
> node names should be generic, labels can be specific:
>
> ov5640: camera at 40 {
> ...
> };
>
> ov5642: camera at 42 {
> ...
> };
fixed.
>
>> + pinctrl_ipu1_csi0: ipu1grp-csi0 {
> Please rename node name to ipu1csi0grp.
done.
>
>> +
>> + pinctrl_ov5640: ov5640grp {
>> + fsl,pins = <
>> + MX6QDL_PAD_NANDF_D5__GPIO2_IO05 0x000b0
>> + MX6QDL_PAD_NANDF_WP_B__GPIO6_IO09 0x0b0b0
>> + >;
>> + };
>> +
> Indentation issues above, please use tabs instead of spaces.
fixed.
>
> Also please add new pin control groups preserving the alphanimerical order.
done.
Steve
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list