[PATCH v2 2/3] dmaeninge: xilinx_dma: Fix bug in multiple frame stores scenario in vdma
Jose Abreu
Jose.Abreu at synopsys.com
Tue Jan 3 05:51:03 PST 2017
Hi Kedar,
On 02-01-2017 16:00, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> Hi Jose Miguel Abreu,
>
> Thanks for the review...
>
> [snip]...
>> I just noticed there is a write to XILINX_DMA_REG_FRMSTORE which, by the
>> description in the VDMA databook, allows to modify the total number of
>> framebuffers.
>>
>> Does it correct this situation: Lets assume VDMA has 10 framebuffers in HW and
>> user only submits 5 descriptors. Then vsize will be programmed and VDMA will
>> start. The VDMA will start in fb 1, then 2, ... until 5 its all ok. But then after the fb
>> 5 the VDMA will jump to fb 6, this fb will have no address because the user only
>> submitted 5 addresses so VDMA will try to write to location 0x0 of system mem
>> (if using S2MM channel). ?
>>
>> If so then there is no race condition, but the HW image that I have does not
>> have this register enabled so I was getting this result (memory corruption
>> because not all framebuffers had addresses set).
> Thanks for the explanation.
> Agree the issue that you mentioned won't come when XILINX_DMA_REG_FRMSTORE
> (C_ENABLE_DEBUG_INFO_5 and C_ENABLE_DEBUG_INFO_13) Register is enabled in the IP.
> But this register won't get enabled with the default IP configuration (C_ENABLE_DEBUG_INFO_5 and C_ENABLE_DEBUG_INFO_13).
>
> When user is not enabled XILINX_DMA_REG_FRMSTORE in the h/w and submits frames less than h/w capable.
> The solution that I am thinking is to throw an error in the driver saying that either enable the
> num frame store feature in the IP or submit the frames up to h/w capable what do you think???
Sounds fine by me.
Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
>
> Regards,
> Kedar.
>
>> Best regards,
>> Jose Miguel Abreu
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kedar.
>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Jose Miguel Abreu
>>>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list