[PATCH 00/12] Marvell NAND controller rework with ->exec_op()

[Miquel RAYNAL]

Hi Robert,

On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 14:42:20 +0100
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik at free.fr> wrote:

> Miquel RAYNAL <miquel.raynal at free-electrons.com> writes:
> 
> I removed a lot of people from the recipients, as this is a debug
> session.

Sure!

> 
> >> > Now I get a lot of these message which I didn't have before :
> >> > [   26.897372] ubi0 warning: ubi_io_read: error -74 (ECC error)
> >> > while reading 126976 bytes from PEB 242:4096, read only 126976  
> >> Looks like a mismatch in the ECC config. Can you check the ecc
> >> strength/step_size in both situation (old driver vs new driver)?  
> >
> > For that, you might want to add traces in marvell_nand_ecc_init()
> > and marvell_nand_hw_ecc_ctrl_init().
> >  
> >> Could you also dump the NDCR register in both cases?  
> >
> > NDCR register (as well as NDCBx registers) will appear if you let
> >
> >     #define DEBUG
> >
> > at the beginning of the driver.
> >
> > Also, can you please give us the entire dmesg (I mean the boot, not
> > the flow of UBIFS errors of course).  
> Here it comes in [3]. I suspect the BBT parser here, here is the
> extract that _might_ be relevant:
> [    3.372907] nand: ->exec_op() parser: pattern not found!

Indeed this might be the problem, it means there is one scenario that
should be handled by the parser that is missing. I am really
interrogative about which one it is and to discover it, can you rebuild
with

        #define DEBUG

in drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c too.

This way the core will display the patterns it try to find a match for.

Also to ease the understanding, you might add a dump_stack() right
next to this error message.


> [    3.378445] marvell-nfc pxa3xx-nand: 
> ... repeats many times ...
> [    3.666571] Bad block table not found for chip 0
> [    3.671368] Scanning device for bad blocks
> [    3.675540] nand: nand_do_read_oob: from = 0x00000000, len = 64
> [    3.681688] marvell-nfc pxa3xx-nand: 
> [    3.681688] NDCR:  0x9d079fff
> [    3.681688] NDCB0: 0x000d3000
> [    3.681688] NDCB1: 0x00000000
> [    3.681688] NDCB2: 0x00000000
> [    3.681688] NDCB3: 0x00000000
> [    3.700570] Bad eraseblock 0 at 0x000000000000
> 
> My configuration is :
>  - make zylonite_defconfig
>  - apply patch in [1] for arch/arm/mach-pxa
>  - apply patch in [2] for drivers/mtd
>  - run the test (make zylonite_defconfig; make;
> do_the_test_with_jenkins) That should give you all my setup
> information, ie. platform_data, ECC and BBT settings (ie. the
> "MBBbt0" pattern).

This is probably a typo, because we expect the pattern to be "MVBbt0"?

> 
> Cheers.
> 



Thanks for the help,
Miquèl


-- 
Miquel Raynal, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com