[PATCH V2 3/9] ARM: stm32: prepare stm32 family to welcome armv7 architecture
Ludovic BARRE
ludovic.barre at st.com
Tue Dec 19 07:54:57 PST 2017
On 12/19/2017 04:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre at st.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/18/2017 09:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Ludovic Barre <ludovic.Barre at st.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre at st.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patch prepares the STM32 machine for the integration of Cortex-A
>>>> based microprocessor (MPU), on top of the existing Cortex-M
>>>> microcontroller family (MCU). Since both MCUs and MPUs are sharing
>>>> common hardware blocks we can keep using ARCH_STM32 flag for most of
>>>> them. If a hardware block is specific to one family we can use either
>>>> ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M or ARCH_MULTI_V7 flag.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre at st.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Looks good overall. Two more small comments:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> +if ARCH_STM32
>>>> +
>>>> config MACH_STM32F429
>>>> - bool "STMicrolectronics STM32F429"
>>>> - depends on ARCH_STM32
>>>> + bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F429"
>>>> + depends on ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M
>>>> default y
>>>
>>>
>>> Instead of the explicit dependency for each board, I'd leave the
>>> surrounding
>>> 'if ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M'. I think you had in v1.
>>
>>
>> As you suggest, I follow mach-at91 example.
>> The point is on "depends on ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M" ?
>> You prefer this way:
>> config MACH_STM32F429
>> bool "STMicroelectronics STM32F429" if ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M
>> default y
>>
>
> No, that would be wrong, that way you would always enable
> MACH_STM32F429 when ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M is turned
> off, which is exactly the wrong way round. What I meant is
>
> if ARCH_STM32
>
> if ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M
>
> config MACH_STM32F429
> bool "STMicrolectronics STM32F429"
>
> config MACH_STM32...
> ...
>
> endif # ARMv7-M
>
> if ARCH_MULTI_V7
>
> config MACH_STM32...
> ...
>
> endif # ARMv7-A
>
> endif # STM32
>
> Arnd
>
Ok, it's clear :-)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list