[PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Add support for multiple regulators
Dave Gerlach
d-gerlach at ti.com
Thu Dec 14 20:25:26 PST 2017
Some platforms, like those in the DRA7 and AM57 families, require the
scaling of multiple regulators in order to properly support higher OPPs.
Let the ti-cpufreq driver determine when this is required and pass the
appropriate regulator names to the OPP core so that they can be properly
managed.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach at ti.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
index b1c230a1e2aa..a099b7bf74cd 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data {
unsigned long efuse_mask;
unsigned long efuse_shift;
unsigned long rev_offset;
+ bool multi_regulator;
};
struct ti_cpufreq_data {
@@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ struct ti_cpufreq_data {
struct device_node *opp_node;
struct regmap *syscon;
const struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
+ struct opp_table *opp_table;
};
static unsigned long amx3_efuse_xlate(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
@@ -96,6 +98,7 @@ static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data am3x_soc_data = {
.efuse_offset = 0x07fc,
.efuse_mask = 0x1fff,
.rev_offset = 0x600,
+ .multi_regulator = false,
};
static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data am4x_soc_data = {
@@ -104,6 +107,7 @@ static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data am4x_soc_data = {
.efuse_offset = 0x0610,
.efuse_mask = 0x3f,
.rev_offset = 0x600,
+ .multi_regulator = false,
};
static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data dra7_soc_data = {
@@ -112,6 +116,7 @@ static struct ti_cpufreq_soc_data dra7_soc_data = {
.efuse_mask = 0xf80000,
.efuse_shift = 19,
.rev_offset = 0x204,
+ .multi_regulator = true,
};
/**
@@ -201,7 +206,9 @@ static int ti_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
u32 version[VERSION_COUNT];
struct device_node *np;
const struct of_device_id *match;
+ struct opp_table *ti_opp_table;
struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data;
+ const char * const reg_names[] = {"vdd", "vbb"};
int ret;
np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
@@ -248,16 +255,29 @@ static int ti_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
goto fail_put_node;
- ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(opp_data->cpu_dev,
- version, VERSION_COUNT));
- if (ret) {
+ ti_opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw(opp_data->cpu_dev,
+ version, VERSION_COUNT);
+ if (IS_ERR(ti_opp_table)) {
dev_err(opp_data->cpu_dev,
"Failed to set supported hardware\n");
+ ret = PTR_ERR(ti_opp_table);
goto fail_put_node;
}
- of_node_put(opp_data->opp_node);
+ opp_data->opp_table = ti_opp_table;
+
+ if (opp_data->soc_data->multi_regulator) {
+ ti_opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(opp_data->cpu_dev,
+ reg_names,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(reg_names));
+ if (IS_ERR(ti_opp_table)) {
+ dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(opp_data->opp_table);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(ti_opp_table);
+ goto fail_put_node;
+ }
+ }
+ of_node_put(opp_data->opp_node);
register_cpufreq_dt:
platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-dt", -1, NULL, 0);
--
2.15.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list