[PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: Support Common Not Private translations

[Vladimir Murzin]

Hi James,

On 13/12/17 14:19, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> On 11/10/17 13:19, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> Common Not Private (CNP) is a feature of ARMv8.2 extension which
>> allows translation table entries to be shared between different PEs in
>> the same inner shareable domain, so the hardware can use this fact to
>> optimise the caching of such entries in the TLB.
>>
>> CNP occupies one bit in TTBRx_ELy and VTTBR_EL2, which advertises to
>> the hardware that the translation table entries pointed to by this
>> TTBR are the same as every PE in the same inner shareable domain for
>> which the equivalent TTBR also has CNP bit set. In case CNP bit is set
>> but TTBR does not point at the same translation table entries or a
>> given ASID and VMID, then the system is mis-configured, so the results
>> of translations are UNPREDICTABLE.
>>
>> This patch adds support for Common Not Private translations on
>> different exceptions levels:
>>
>> (1) For EL0 there are a few cases we need to care of changes in
>>     TTBR0_EL1:
>>     - a switch to idmap
>>     - software emulated PAN
>>     we rule out latter via Kconfig options and for the former we make
>>     sure that CNP is set for non-zero ASIDs only.
>>
>> (2) For EL1 we postpone setting CNP till all cpus are up and rely on
>>     cpufeature framework to 1) patch the code which is sensitive to
>>     CNP and 2) update TTBR1_EL1 with CNP bit set. TTBR1_EL1 can be
>>     reprogrammed as result of hibernation or cpuidle (via __enable_mmu).
>>     cpuidle's path has been changed to restore CnP and for hibernation
>>     the code has been changed to save raw TTBR1_EL1 and blindly restore
>>     it on resume.
> 
> 
> While I remember:
> 
> This feature is going to be fun for kdump, we may leave secondary CPUs running
> if they don't take the IPI to crash-out of the kernel. Worse, if we don't have
> PSCI they just spin in a loop while the surviving CPU brings up the crash kernel
> and maybe-enables CNP...
> 
> I think the best fix for this is to refuse to enable CNP at all if we're a crash
> kernel. There is stuff in the DT to indicate this... we should know about the
> 'elfcorehdr' before cpufeature runs. (I don't think we should rely on the
> cmdline option).
> 
> kexec is unaffected because it always powers-off the secondary CPUs before
> leaving the old kernel. This behaves much more like a normal boot.

Thanks, I'll look into it.

Vladimir 

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James
>