[PATCH v3 1/2] cpuidle: Add new macro to enter a retention idle state
Rafael J. Wysocki
rjw at rjwysocki.net
Tue Dec 12 17:05:33 PST 2017
On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 6:11:49 PM CET Prashanth Prakash wrote:
> If a CPU is entering a low power idle state where it doesn't lose any
> context, then there is no need to call cpu_pm_enter()/cpu_pm_exit().
> Add a new macro(CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION) to be used by cpuidle
> drivers when they are entering retention state. By not calling
> cpu_pm_enter and cpu_pm_exit we reduce the latency involved in
> entering and exiting the retention idle states.
>
> CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION assumes that no state is lost and
> hence CPU PM notifiers will not be called. We may need a broader
> change if we need to support partial retention states effeciently.
>
> On ARM64 based Qualcomm Server Platform we measured below overhead for
> for calling cpu_pm_enter and cpu_pm_exit for retention states.
>
> workload: stress --hdd #CPUs --hdd-bytes 32M -t 30
> Average overhead of cpu_pm_enter - 1.2us
> Average overhead of cpu_pm_exit - 3.1us
>
> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash at codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> index 8f7788d..871f9e2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> @@ -257,22 +257,30 @@ static inline int cpuidle_register_governor(struct cpuidle_governor *gov)
> {return 0;}
> #endif
>
> -#define CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(low_level_idle_enter, idx) \
> -({ \
> - int __ret; \
> - \
> - if (!idx) { \
> - cpu_do_idle(); \
> - return idx; \
> - } \
> - \
> - __ret = cpu_pm_enter(); \
> - if (!__ret) { \
> - __ret = low_level_idle_enter(idx); \
> - cpu_pm_exit(); \
> - } \
> - \
> - __ret ? -1 : idx; \
> +#define __CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(low_level_idle_enter, idx, is_retention) \
> +({ \
> + int __ret = 0; \
> + \
> + if (!idx) { \
> + cpu_do_idle(); \
> + return idx; \
> + } \
> + \
> + if (!is_retention) \
> + __ret = cpu_pm_enter(); \
> + if (!__ret) { \
> + __ret = low_level_idle_enter(idx); \
> + if (!is_retention) \
> + cpu_pm_exit(); \
> + } \
> + \
> + __ret ? -1 : idx; \
> })
>
> +#define CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(low_level_idle_enter, idx) \
> + __CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(low_level_idle_enter, idx, 0)
> +
> +#define CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION(low_level_idle_enter, idx) \
> + __CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(low_level_idle_enter, idx, 1)
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_CPUIDLE_H */
>
This change is fine by me, so you can add
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
to it, but it kind of doesn't make sense to apply it alone, so please feel free
to route it via ARM64.
Thanks,
Rafael
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list