[PATCH 3/5] arm_pmu: acpi: check for mismatched PPIs
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Mon Dec 11 10:08:31 PST 2017
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 05:37:07PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:12:37PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > The arm_pmu platform code explicitly checks for mismatched PPIs at probe
> > time, while the ACPI code leaves this to the core code. Future
> > refactoring will make this difficult for the core code to check, so
> > let's have the ACPI code check this explicitly.
> >
> > As before, upon a failure we'll continue on without an interrupt. Ho
> > hum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 16 ++++------------
> > drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > index 3d6d4c5f2356..e0242103d904 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > @@ -557,18 +557,10 @@ int armpmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
> > if (!irq)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq) && cpumask_empty(&armpmu->active_irqs)) {
> > - err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
> > - &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
> > - } else if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)) {
> > - int other_cpu = cpumask_first(&armpmu->active_irqs);
> > - int other_irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, other_cpu);
> > -
> > - if (irq != other_irq) {
> > - pr_warn("mismatched PPIs detected.\n");
> > - err = -EINVAL;
> > - goto err_out;
> > - }
> > + if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)) {
> > + if (cpumask_empty(&armpmu->active_irqs))
>
> Why not leave this as before, with a '&&' operator?
Because then we'd fall into the else case (for SPIs), were the
active_irqs mask empty.
Previously, that would have been caught by the irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)
case that got removed.
I can instead make this:
if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq) && cpumask_empty(&armpmu->active_irqs)) {
err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
&hw_events->percpu_pmu);
} else if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)) {
/* nothing to do */
} else {
< SPI case >
}
... but that seemed more painful to read.
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list