[PATCH 11/13] irq debug: do not use print_symbol()
David Laight
David.Laight at ACULAB.COM
Mon Dec 11 04:55:49 PST 2017
From: Sergey Senozhatsky
> Sent: 11 December 2017 12:50
> print_symbol() uses extra stack space to sprintf() symbol
> information and then to feed that buffer to printk()
>
> char buffer[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
>
> sprint_symbol(buffer, address);
> printk(fmt, buffer);
>
> Replace print_symbol() with a direct printk("%pS") call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky at gmail.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/irq/debug.h | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/debug.h b/kernel/irq/debug.h
> index 17f05ef8f575..5766e15c1160 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/debug.h
> +++ b/kernel/irq/debug.h
...
> @@ -15,13 +13,13 @@ static inline void print_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> printk("irq %d, desc: %p, depth: %d, count: %d, unhandled: %d\n",
> irq, desc, desc->depth, desc->irq_count, desc->irqs_unhandled);
> printk("->handle_irq(): %p, ", desc->handle_irq);
> - print_symbol("%s\n", (unsigned long)desc->handle_irq);
> + pr_cont("%pS\n", desc->handle_irq);
Looks like you can (and should) use a single printk() instead of pr_cont.
David
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list