[PATCH v4 09/12] clk: qcom: Add Krait clock controller driver

[Sricharan R]

Hi Philippe,


On 12/8/2017 3:53 PM, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> Sricharan, Stephen,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Sricharan R <sricharan at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
>>
>> The Krait CPU clocks are made up of a primary mux and secondary
>> mux for each CPU and the L2, controlled via cp15 accessors. For
>> Kraits within KPSSv1 each secondary mux accepts a different aux
>> source, but on KPSSv2 each secondary mux accepts the same aux
>> source.
>>
>> Cc: <devicetree at vger.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org>
> []
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/krait-cc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,350 @@
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2013-2015, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
>> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
> 
> Have you considered using the new SPDX ids? Something like this:
> 
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> // Copyright (c) 2013-2015, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> 
> Beside  being simpler and increasing the code to comment ratio by
> deleting 9 lines of boilerplate, this will also save a few trees over
> the long term each time that I print the source code of the kernel ;)
> (do not worry, I am NOT as insane as to really print the kernel
> sources, but someone more insane than me may well do it)
> 
> You may wonder about the C++ // comment style I used here... Please
> see Linus posts on the topic as well as Thomas doc patches overall for
> instructions on using the SPDX ids.
> 
> And if you were to do this for your past, present and future
> contributions (eventually these of your group), I would be quite
> grateful.
> 
> Thank you for your kind consideration
> 

Ha ok. will change it to use this one. Infact saw this feedback on other
patches, but missed updating to it while sending.

Regards,
 Sricharan

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus