[PATCH v9 3/5] perf utils: use pmu->is_uncore to detect PMU UNCORE devices

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:35:22PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
> A quick test with the new patch 'fix_json_v9_2.patch' shows it working.

Where is this fix_json_v9_2.patch file? I want to fold it with the patch
introducing the problem.

- Arnaldo
 
> See the log:
> 
> root at skl:/tmp# perf stat --per-thread -p 10322 -M CPI,IPC
> ^C
>  Performance counter stats for process id '10322':
> 
>           vmstat-10322             1,879,654      inst_retired.any #
> 0.8 CPI
>           vmstat-10322             1,565,807      cycles
>           vmstat-10322             1,879,654      inst_retired.any #
> 1.2 IPC
>           vmstat-10322             1,565,807      cpu_clk_unhalted.thread
> 
>        2.850291804 seconds time elapsed
> 
> Thanks for fixing it quickly.
> 
> Thanks
> Jin Yao
> 
> On 12/5/2017 3:23 PM, Jin, Yao wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I applied the diff but it's failed.
> > 
> > jinyao at skl:~/skl-ws/perf-dev/lck-4594/src$ patch -p1 < 1.pat
> > patching file tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> > patch: **** malformed patch at line 41: *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> > 
> > Could you send the patch as attachment to me in another mail thread?
> > 
> > to yao.jin at linux.intel.com
> > cc yao.jin at intel.com
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Jin Yao
> > 
> > On 12/5/2017 3:12 PM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> > > index 5ad8a18..57e38fd 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
> > > @@ -538,6 +538,34 @@ static bool pmu_is_uncore(const char *name)
> > >   }
> > > 
> > >   /*
> > > + *  PMU CORE devices have different name other than cpu in sysfs on some
> > > + *  platforms. looking for possible sysfs files to identify as core
> > > device.
> > > + */
> > > +static int is_pmu_core(const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > + struct stat st;
> > > + char path[PATH_MAX];
> > > + const char *sysfs = sysfs__mountpoint();
> > > +
> > > + if (!sysfs)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + /* Look for cpu sysfs (x86 and others) */
> > > + scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/bus/event_source/devices/cpu", sysfs);
> > > + if ((stat(path, &st) == 0) &&
> > > + (strncmp(name, "cpu", strlen("cpu")) == 0))
> > > + return 1;
> > > +
> > > + /* Look for cpu sysfs (specific to arm) */
> > > + scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/bus/event_source/devices/%s/cpus",
> > > + sysfs, name);
> > > + if (stat(path, &st) == 0)
> > > + return 1;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > >    * Return the CPU id as a raw string.
> > >    *
> > >    * Each architecture should provide a more precise id string that
> > > @@ -641,7 +669,7 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head
> > > *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
> > >    break;
> > >    }
> > > 
> > > - if (pmu->is_uncore) {
> > > + if (!is_pmu_core(name)) {
> > >    /* check for uncore devices */
> > >    if (pe->pmu == NULL)
> > >    continue;