[PATCH 23/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred VM sysregs

[Christoffer Dall]

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:54:02PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:41:27PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > When we defer the save/restore of system registers to vcpu_load and
> > vcpu_put, we need to take care of the emulation code that handles traps
> > to these registers, since simply reading the memory array will return
> > stale data.
> > 
> > Therefore, introduce two functions to directly read/write the registers
> > from the physical CPU when we're on a VHE system that has loaded the
> > system registers onto the physical CPU.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  4 +++
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 9f5761f..dcded44 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -278,6 +278,10 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> >  
> >  	/* Detect first run of a vcpu */
> >  	bool has_run_once;
> > +
> > +	/* True when deferrable sysregs are loaded on the physical CPU,
> > +	 * see kvm_vcpu_load_sysregs and kvm_vcpu_put_sysregs. */
> > +	bool sysregs_loaded_on_cpu;
> 
> To be sure I understand correctly, this should only be false when we're
> servicing ioctls that don't do a full vcpu_load first (non-KVM_RUN) or
> when we're not running on a CPU with VHE. If we didn't need to worry
> about non-KVM_RUN ioctls, then we could use the static key has_vhe(),
> right?
> 

That is correct, if we also liked the idea of replacing the entire CPU
state every time we read/write a single register from user space.
However, as this isn't performance critical, I'd much rather have a flag
that tells me where to go look for the latest value of a system
register.

> >  };
> >  
> >  #define vcpu_gp_regs(v)		(&(v)->arch.ctxt.gp_regs)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > index dbe35fd..f7887dd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/kvm_coproc.h>
> >  #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> >  #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> > +#include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> >  #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> >  #include <asm/perf_event.h>
> >  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> > @@ -110,8 +111,57 @@ static bool access_dcsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static u64 read_deferrable_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
> > +{
> > +	if (vcpu->arch.sysregs_loaded_on_cpu) {
> > +		switch (reg) {
> > +		case SCTLR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(sctlr);
> > +		case TTBR0_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(ttbr0);
> > +		case TTBR1_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(ttbr1);
> > +		case TCR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(tcr);
> > +		case ESR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(esr);
> > +		case FAR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(far);
> > +		case AFSR0_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(afsr0);
> > +		case AFSR1_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(afsr1);
> > +		case MAIR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(mair);
> > +		case AMAIR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(amair);
> > +		case CONTEXTIDR_EL1:	return read_sysreg_el1(contextidr);
> > +		case DACR32_EL2:	return read_sysreg(dacr32_el2);
> > +		case IFSR32_EL2:	return read_sysreg(ifsr32_el2);
> > +		default:		BUG();
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void write_deferrable_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg, u64 val)
> > +{
> > +	if (vcpu->arch.sysregs_loaded_on_cpu) {
> > +		switch (reg) {
> > +		case SCTLR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, sctlr);	return;
> > +		case TTBR0_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, ttbr0);	return;
> > +		case TTBR1_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, ttbr1);	return;
> > +		case TCR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, tcr);	return;
> > +		case ESR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, esr);	return;
> > +		case FAR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, far);	return;
> > +		case AFSR0_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, afsr0);	return;
> > +		case AFSR1_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, afsr1);	return;
> > +		case MAIR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, mair);	return;
> > +		case AMAIR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, amair);	return;
> > +		case CONTEXTIDR_EL1:	write_sysreg_el1(val, contextidr); return;
> > +		case DACR32_EL2:	write_sysreg(val, dacr32_el2); return;
> > +		case IFSR32_EL2:	write_sysreg(val, ifsr32_el2); return;
> > +		default:		BUG();
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = val;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Generic accessor for VM registers. Only called as long as HCR_TVM
> > + *
> >   * is set. If the guest enables the MMU, we stop trapping the VM
> >   * sys_regs and leave it in complete control of the caches.
> >   */
> > @@ -132,14 +182,14 @@ static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  	if (!p->is_aarch32 || !p->is_32bit) {
> >  		val = p->regval;
> >  	} else {
> > -		val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +		val = read_deferrable_vm_reg(vcpu, reg);
> >  		if (r->reg % 2)
> >  			val = (p->regval << 32) | (u64)lower_32_bits(val);
> >  		else
> >  			val = ((u64)upper_32_bits(val) << 32) |
> >  				(u64)lower_32_bits(p->regval);
> >  	}
> > -	vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = val;
> > +	write_deferrable_vm_reg(vcpu, reg, val);
> >  
> >  	kvm_toggle_cache(vcpu, was_enabled);
> >  	return true;
> > -- 
> > 2.9.0
> >
> 
> I read ahead and see other wrappers that check sysregs_loaded_on_cpu are
> added, but only write_deferrable_vm_reg() has 'deferrable' in its name.
> Should it just be named read/write_vm_reg?
> 

I chose this name to avoid implying that this function was universally
supported for all (current and future) VM registers.

Thanks,
-Christoffer